IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v7y2014i11p15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Generic Reference in English, Arabic and Malay: A Cross Linguistic Typology and Comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Eidhah Abdullah AL-Malki
  • Norazman Abdul Majid
  • Noor Abidah Mohd Omar

Abstract

According to the Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English 1999 by Biber et al. (p. 266) generic article uses are more than twice as common in academic English than in conversation or fiction. This is an area that English for Academic Purpose (EPA) textbooks and teachers would need to target more than general English teaching. This paper is therefore a contribution towards better understanding of what linguistic facts about generics teachers and textbooks of EAP might need to cover in order to deal with them satisfactorily, particularly for learners with Arabic or Malay as L1. This paper is also significant as it is the first to compare the expression of generic meanings by noun phrases in three typologically quite different languages- the Germanic language English, the Semitic language Arabic and the Austronesian language Malay. The contrast between the three languages is substantial in that they have different settings according to the nominal mapping parameter (NMP), which captures some widespread generalizations about the occurrence of mass and countable nouns and articles in the languages of the world. As a part of a bigger project that investigates the acquisition and interpretation of generic reference by speakers of these languages, this article is descriptive and comparative in nature. The main finding is that the rules for mapping forms to generic meanings are more complex in English than in Malay or Arabic, in that English marks the difference between NP level and S level genericity and between established and non-established categories.

Suggested Citation

  • Eidhah Abdullah AL-Malki & Norazman Abdul Majid & Noor Abidah Mohd Omar, 2014. "Generic Reference in English, Arabic and Malay: A Cross Linguistic Typology and Comparison," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 7(11), pages 1-15, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:7:y:2014:i:11:p:15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/41501/22736
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/41501
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:7:y:2014:i:11:p:15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.