IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v7y2013i1p93.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of the Effectiveness of StyleWriter and Microsoft Word Computer Software to Improve English Writing Skills

Author

Listed:
  • Sunita Prvinchandar
  • Ahmad Fauzi Mohd Ayub

Abstract

This study compared the effectiveness of two types of computer software for improving the English writing skills of pupils in a Malaysian primary school. Sixty students who participated in the seven-week training course were divided into two groups, with the experimental group using the StyleWriter software and the control group using the Microsoft Word programme. A pre-test was administered before the experiment was conducted. This was followed by post-tests upon completion of the course, where a computer-based assessment, as well as a pen-and-paper assessment, was employed. In each test, four components of writing skills were assessed, namely grammar, vocabulary, spelling, sentence structure, besides the overall performance. The findings indicated that the students who were exposed to StyleWriter had significantly better scores in all the writing components compared to the control group using Microsoft Word in both pen-and-paper and computer-based essay writing assessments. This study showed that StyleWriter enhanced the students’ writing skills even when computer assistance was no longer available.

Suggested Citation

  • Sunita Prvinchandar & Ahmad Fauzi Mohd Ayub, 2013. "Comparison of the Effectiveness of StyleWriter and Microsoft Word Computer Software to Improve English Writing Skills," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 7(1), pages 1-93, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:7:y:2013:i:1:p:93
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/32584/18947
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/32584
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:7:y:2013:i:1:p:93. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.