IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v6y2013i9p146.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Corpus-Based Study of Malaysian ESL Learners’ Use of Modals in Argumentative Compositions

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed Ismail bin Abdul Kader
  • Neda Begi
  • Reza Vaseghi

Abstract

This study attempts to examine the use of English modals in terms of their frequency and functions. For this purpose, Form 4 and College students’ argumentative compositions were extracted from the Malaysian Corpus of Students’ Argumentative Writing (MCSAW). In order to analyze the data, this study employed discourse analysis and some descriptive statistics by using the WordSmith Tools Version 4.0. The findings of the study showed that Form 4 and College students used can and will more frequently in argumentative compositions compared to other modals. Moreover, the result illustrated the exploitation of present tense form of modal than the past tense form. Finally, it was also revealed that the modals of ability were the most frequent modals found in Form 4 and College students’ compositions in terms of their appropriate function. In order to improve the teaching, learning and effective usage of modal auxiliaries among ESL learners, all the central modals must be emphasized repetitively to enhance students’ understanding of modals and their functions.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed Ismail bin Abdul Kader & Neda Begi & Reza Vaseghi, 2013. "A Corpus-Based Study of Malaysian ESL Learners’ Use of Modals in Argumentative Compositions," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 6(9), pages 146-146, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:6:y:2013:i:9:p:146
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/29653/17590
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/29653
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jayakaran Mukundan & Norwati Roslim, 2009. "Textbook Representation of Prepositions," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 2(4), pages 1-13, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mia Emily Abdul Rahim & Emma Marini Abdul Rahim & Chia Han Ning, 2013. "Distribution of Articles in Written Composition among Malaysian ESL Learners," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 6(10), pages 149-149, October.
    2. Jayakaran Mukundan & Khairil Anuar bin Saadullah & Razalina binti Ismail & Nur Hairunnisa binti Jusoh Zasenawi, 2013. "Malaysian ESL Students’ Syntactic Accuracy in the Usage of English Modal Verbs in Argumentative Writing," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 6(12), pages 1-98, December.
    3. Norwati Roslim & Jayakaran Mukundan, 2011. "An Overview of Corpus Linguistics Studies on Prepositions," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 4(2), pages 125-125, June.
    4. Abdul Latef bin Alhadri* & Muhamad Rozaimi bin Ramle, 2018. "A Critical Analysis of Prophetic Narrations Mentioned in KAFA JAKIM’s‘ Aq?dah Textbooks," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 1264-1271:6.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:6:y:2013:i:9:p:146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.