IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v6y2013i9p110.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Hierarchy Vocabulary Exercises on English Vocabulary Acquisition

Author

Listed:
  • Lin, Ching-Ying
  • Hsu, Wei Shu

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to compare the effectiveness of hierarchy vocabulary exercises and copying vocabulary exercises on EFL students’ vocabulary acquisition and reading comprehension. Two specific factors were probed- (a) vocabulary gains and retention from different exercises; (b) reading comprehension performance through different exercises. Fifty-six Grade 5 students in Yanpu Elementary School in Taiwan were engaged in either hierarchy vocabulary exercises or copying vocabulary exercises, with sixteen target words. The results revealed that the experimental group receiving hierarchy vocabulary exercises significantly outperformed the control group receiving copying vocabulary exercises on students’ performance of vocabulary gains, reading comprehension, as well as short-term and long-term word memory retention. A positive correlation between vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension was also inspected. It was, therefore, concluded that hierarchy vocabulary exercise was a more effective exercise type for vocabulary acquisition and reading comprehension.

Suggested Citation

  • Lin, Ching-Ying & Hsu, Wei Shu, 2013. "Effects of Hierarchy Vocabulary Exercises on English Vocabulary Acquisition," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 6(9), pages 110-110, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:6:y:2013:i:9:p:110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/29649/17586
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/29649
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:6:y:2013:i:9:p:110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.