IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v6y2013i8p85.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corrective Feedback (CF) and English-Major EFL Learners’ Ability in Grammatical Error Detection and Correction

Author

Listed:
  • Sahail M. Asassfeh

Abstract

Corrective feedback (CF), the implicit or explicit information learners receive indicating a gap between their current, compared to the desired, performance, has been an area of interest for EFL researchers during the last few decades. This study, conducted on 139 English-major prospective EFL teachers, assessed the impact of two CF types (implicit vs. explicit) on students’ ability to detect and correct some “common†grammatical errors (definite and indefinite article, subject-verb agreement, prepositions, spelling, and logical connector use). The study used a quasi-experimental pretest, posttest with a 12-week treatment program. The results indicated a statistically significant difference in students’ performance prior to and after exposure to the intervention, confirming the positive role CF has on students' performance. However, there was no significant difference attributed to the type of CF introduced. The paper sets recommendations for both practitioners and researchers and suggests a reconceptualization of the EFL learning process.

Suggested Citation

  • Sahail M. Asassfeh, 2013. "Corrective Feedback (CF) and English-Major EFL Learners’ Ability in Grammatical Error Detection and Correction," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 6(8), pages 1-85, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:6:y:2013:i:8:p:85
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/28734/17170
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/28734
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Razie Abedi & Mehdi Latifi & Ahmad moinzadeh, 2010. "The Effect of Error Correction vs. Error Detection on Iranian Pre-Intermediate EFL Learners' Writing Achievement," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 3(4), pages 168-168, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      JEL classification:

      • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
      • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:6:y:2013:i:8:p:85. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.