IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v6y2013i7p158.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving EFL Graduate Students’ Proficiency in Writing through an Online Automated Essay Assessing System

Author

Listed:
  • Ke Ma

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of using an online Automated Essay Assessing (AEA) system on EFL graduate students’ writing. Eighty four EFL graduate students divided into the treatment group and the control group participated in this study. The treatment group was asked to use an AEA system to assist their essay writing. Both groups were pretested before the treatment. After the sixteen-week treatment period, the writing posttest was given to both groups to measure their progress in their writing. The results indicate that, although both groups have no significant difference in the pretest, the difference between their mean scores on the posttest is statistically significant. The mean score of the treatment group is higher than that of the control group, and students’ use frequency of the AEA system is closely related to their writing improvement. Therefore, it is concluded that, students’ using the AEA system contributes significantly to their writing improvement. Thus a linear regression is modeled to predict the weight of the AEA system use frequency to proficiency improvement in writing. Finally, students’ perceptions based on their learning journals and interviews show the changes in the process of writing.

Suggested Citation

  • Ke Ma, 2013. "Improving EFL Graduate Students’ Proficiency in Writing through an Online Automated Essay Assessing System," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 6(7), pages 158-158, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:6:y:2013:i:7:p:158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/28014/16902
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/28014
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:6:y:2013:i:7:p:158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.