IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v6y2013i4p97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Malaysian Gifted Students’ Use of English Language Learning Strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Melor Md Yunus
  • Nur Ainil Sulaiman
  • Mohammed Amin Embi

Abstract

Many studies have been done on language learning strategies employed by different type of learners and in various contexts. However, very little studies have been done on gifted students regarding language learning. Gifted students have unique characteristics and have different ways if thinking and learning. These characteristics affect how they learn a language. The main objective of the study was to investigate language learning strategies use among gifted students enrolled in special programme called PERMATApintar Education Programme. Data was gathered using a survey questionnaire with 104 gifted students. The instrument used in this study was Strategy Inventory Language Learning (SILL) questionnaire by Oxford (1990). Data was analyzed using descriptive analysis. It provides mean, percentages of responses and level of frequency. The findings revealed that gifted students use more indirect strategies particularly metacognitive strategies than direct strategies. There was variation in responses with regard to the use of language learning strategies among Malaysian gifted students. Language learning strategies have many potential benefits to educators, teachers and students. Implications and suggestions for future research are further discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Melor Md Yunus & Nur Ainil Sulaiman & Mohammed Amin Embi, 2013. "Malaysian Gifted Students’ Use of English Language Learning Strategies," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 6(4), pages 1-97, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:6:y:2013:i:4:p:97
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/25755/15919
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/25755
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:6:y:2013:i:4:p:97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.