IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v5y2012i7p140.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Three-part Argumentative Writings for English Majors in China

Author

Listed:
  • Luo Mingli

Abstract

Writing is a kind of creative thinking activity. The teaching of Three-part argumentative writing is crucial in college English instruction. Many English majors that fail to write well lack sufficient input of English argumentative reading materials, use Chinese thinking and structure to express their ideas, and lack frequent and sufficient writing practice in English. This paper reviews the application of scaffolding theory and schema theory in writing, and proposes a series of training strategies of blank-filling writing, guided writing, controlled writing, and free writing. Through this series of training that is based on the process approach, the product approach as well as the genre approach, students can gain better writing skills. They can learn how to plan before writing and improve their abilities to write argumentative essays in English effectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Luo Mingli, 2012. "Research on Three-part Argumentative Writings for English Majors in China," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 5(7), pages 140-140, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:5:y:2012:i:7:p:140
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/18364/12161
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/18364
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:5:y:2012:i:7:p:140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.