IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v5y2012i11p104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing a Non-language Related Span Test for the Use in Language-specific and Cross-language Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammadtaghi Shahnazari-Dorcheh
  • Saeed Roshan

Abstract

Due to the lack of span test for the use in language-specific and cross-language studies, this study provides L1 and L2 researchers with a reliable language-independent span test (math span test) for the measurement of working memory capacity. It also describes the development, validation, and scoring method of this test. This test included 70 simple math problems, and was developed based on Salthouse and Babcock’s (1991) and Robert and Gibson’s (2002) math span tests. The shortcomings of the test were identified and removed over five pilot studies on 48 participants. The final test was used in an experimental study with a group of L1 Persian EFL learners. Results of an item analysis, as indicated by Cronbach’s Alpha, indicated an internal reliability of .850 and .863 for the math span test processing and recall respectively. This suggests that the newly developed test is reliable enough and could be used to measure working memory capacity in L1 and L2 studies. This study also provides a clear procedure for the development and scoring of a math span test for the use in L1 and L2 studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammadtaghi Shahnazari-Dorcheh & Saeed Roshan, 2012. "Developing a Non-language Related Span Test for the Use in Language-specific and Cross-language Studies," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 5(11), pages 104-104, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:5:y:2012:i:11:p:104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/20519/13489
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/20519
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:5:y:2012:i:11:p:104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.