IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v5y2012i10p173.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Expression of Epistemic Stance in EFL Chinese University Students’ Writing

Author

Listed:
  • Zhenzhen Chen

Abstract

This paper reported findings on a contrastive analysis of epistemic expressions in argumentative essays between NS and NNS Chinese L2 writers. Based on an examination of a NS corpus and a NNS learner corpus across four proficiency levels, the study shows there is great similarity in the total number of epistemic devices used per thousand words between the NS and NNS university students’ written texts. However, the NNS were found to use a restricted range of epistemic items to express epistemic modality and their written texts were marked by strong, unwarranted assertions compared with those of NS students. The study suggested there seems to be an improvement in selecting an appropriate level of commitment to the propositions being expressed with the increase in the students’ proficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhenzhen Chen, 2012. "Expression of Epistemic Stance in EFL Chinese University Students’ Writing," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 5(10), pages 173-173, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:5:y:2012:i:10:p:173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/19962/13165
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/19962
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chunyu Hu & Xuyan Li, 2015. "Epistemic Modality in the Argumentative Essays of Chinese EFL Learners," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(6), pages 1-20, June.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:5:y:2012:i:10:p:173. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.