IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v4y2011i2p55.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study on the Relationship between University Students’ Chinese Writing Proficiency and Their English Writing Proficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoyu Huang
  • Xueying Liang
  • Effie Dracopoulos

Abstract

Up to now, most researchers have been paying attention to the negative transfer of mother tongue to second language writing. Few studies, if any, have touched upon the positive transfer. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate the positive transfer of Chinese to 26 first-year university students’ English writing holistically and segmentally in the use of words, grammar, coherence, and content and organization. The result of the Pearson correlation coefficient turned out to be 0.43 at the 5% significance level, indicating a positive relationship between the Chinese writing and the English writing. The questionnaires have also confirmed the result of the correlation analysis. In particular, the positive transfer of Chinese seems to be more apparent in the content and organization of the English writing, followed by coherence and use of words. Thus, it can be concluded that the positive transfer of mother tongue can facilitate English writing.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoyu Huang & Xueying Liang & Effie Dracopoulos, 2011. "A Study on the Relationship between University Students’ Chinese Writing Proficiency and Their English Writing Proficiency," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 4(2), pages 1-55, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:4:y:2011:i:2:p:55
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/10767/7659
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/10767
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:4:y:2011:i:2:p:55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.