IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v3y2010i4p152.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

English Language Learning Strategy Use by Chinese Senior High School Students

Author

Listed:
  • Yaping Zhou

Abstract

Language learning strategies are important factors that affect students’ learning. In China, senior high school is an important stage in a person’s education. This study examines the English language learning strategy use by Chinese senior high school students by means of the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning. The findings reveal that Chinese senior high school students use compensation strategies most frequently; that significant differences exist between male students and female students with female students using strategies more frequently than males; and that differences also exist in the strategy use among the three grades. The reasons for these differences in strategy use by Chinese senior high school students are discussed and implications for the future language learning strategy training and English teaching are put forward.

Suggested Citation

  • Yaping Zhou, 2010. "English Language Learning Strategy Use by Chinese Senior High School Students," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 3(4), pages 152-152, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:3:y:2010:i:4:p:152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/37023/20727
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/37023
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chaoying Zhou & Channarong Intaraprasert, 2014. "Language Learning Strategies Employed by Chinese English-Major Pre-Service Teachers in Relation to Gender and Personality Types," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(1), pages 155-155, January.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:3:y:2010:i:4:p:152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.