IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v3y2010i3p194.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Brief Analysis on the Two Chinese Versions of Pride and Prejudice from the Perspective of Ideology

Author

Listed:
  • Feng Zhang

Abstract

Pride and Prejudice, owing to its romantic and superb language, enjoys a great audience and has at least five Chinese versions in circulation. Among them are two versions which are translated by the most authoritative translators published in China- the version translated by Wang Keyi and the version translated by Sun Zhili. The former got its first edition in 1956 while the latter was first published in the year of 1994. In terms of the ideology, the different features of the versions are shown. Ideology, the “invisible hand†manipulating translation practice, has certain influence to the two Chinese versions. This thesis tries to analyze the influence of ideology in and out of the text to the versions of Pride and Prejudice, which will lead to a new way for the translation criticism in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Feng Zhang, 2010. "A Brief Analysis on the Two Chinese Versions of Pride and Prejudice from the Perspective of Ideology," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 3(3), pages 194-194, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:3:y:2010:i:3:p:194
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/7231/5583
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/7231
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:3:y:2010:i:3:p:194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.