IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v3y2010i2p162.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

To Give Control to Learners or Not? A Comparative Study of Two Ways of Teaching Listening

Author

Listed:
  • Yushan Wang

Abstract

This paper reports a quasi-experimental study that was carried out in listening classes to address the following questions- What control do students expect in the listening classroom? What are the effects of the “zero class hour†way of teaching listening when more control is given to the students? The study was conducted at Huaiyin Normal University, where two non-English major classes taught by one teacher were selected. A questionnaire survey was conducted to get students’ opinion about the traditional way of teaching listening and what control they wanted to have. The results of the pretest and posttest were analyzed with SPSS. Both the experiment group and the control group made similar progress in the test of their listening comprehension, which indicates that the new way of teaching listening is as effective as the traditional one. From the amount of time that the experimental-group students spent on improving their listening comprehension, we can see that they made more efforts and became more active and more autonomous than before. The findings may give some support for the web-based distance education.

Suggested Citation

  • Yushan Wang, 2010. "To Give Control to Learners or Not? A Comparative Study of Two Ways of Teaching Listening," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 3(2), pages 162-162, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:3:y:2010:i:2:p:162
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/6286/5024
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/6286
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:3:y:2010:i:2:p:162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.