IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v3y2010i1p92.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Metadiscourse Awareness on L2 Reading Comprehension: A Case of Iranian EFL Learners

Author

Listed:
  • Mansoor Tavakoli
  • Azizollah Dabaghi
  • Zohreh Khorvash

Abstract

This research attempts to investigate the degree of students’ achievement in reading comprehension in English as a foreign language through explicit instruction in metadiscourse markers. For this purpose, 80 students studying at a language school (placed at intermediate levels of English language proficiency) were chosen to participate in the experiment. Every possible measure was taken to ensure that the participants lacked enough knowledge about metadiscourse. The participants were then randomly divided into four equal groups each containing twenty students. The first experimental group (EG1) included twenty participants who received instructions in both textual and interpersonal metadiscourse. The second experimental group (EG2) received instructions in only textual metadiscourse markers. The third experimental group (EG3) received instructions in only interpersonal metadiscourse. The control group received no specific instructions in metadiscourse and was only exposed to some input enhancement material and relevant exercises.As a result of running a number of statistical procedures, instruction on metadiscourse revealed a positive effect on the participants’ achievement in reading comprehension in English. The results of the study have some implications for materials designers; they can improve a learner’s ability to understand and remember information from the text by improving it textually and interpersonally.

Suggested Citation

  • Mansoor Tavakoli & Azizollah Dabaghi & Zohreh Khorvash, 2010. "The Effect of Metadiscourse Awareness on L2 Reading Comprehension: A Case of Iranian EFL Learners," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 3(1), pages 1-92, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:3:y:2010:i:1:p:92
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/5218/4336
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/5218
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:3:y:2010:i:1:p:92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.