IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v2y2009i4p82.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reader Stance and a Focus on Gender Differences

Author

Listed:
  • Feng-ming Chi

Abstract

The purpose of this paper, drawing data from a large research base, was to investigate how and why Taiwanese EFL (English as a Foreign Language) male and female university students responded to feminist texts differently. These participants were taking an elective course titled Gender and Reading while this research was conducted. Weekly reading journal entries were used for data analysis. Idea units were first used to categorize participants’ journal entries; relevant idea units were grouped together, and then organized into stances for discussion. Four stances–textual, evaluative, reflective, and resistant–were generated for interpretation. Comparative content analysis was then applied to contrast male and female participants’ stances while responding to feminist texts. Some pedagogical implications are suggested for classroom practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Feng-ming Chi, 2009. "Reader Stance and a Focus on Gender Differences," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 2(4), pages 1-82, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:2:y:2009:i:4:p:82
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/4452/3794
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/4452
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:2:y:2009:i:4:p:82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.