IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v2y2009i3p232.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Survey on the English Learning Strategy of the Rural High School Students and Urban High School Students

Author

Listed:
  • Yanfeng Hu

Abstract

This paper aims to investigate the overall characteristics of the rural and urban high school students’ learning strategy selection and use. The results indicate that the general frequency of the subjects’ learning strategies selection and use is not satisfying. Among the six learning strategies, the most used strategies are affective strategies, and the least used strategies by the subjects are social strategies. What’s more, the research results show that the urban students, compared to the rural ones, do better in using all the strategies. But through T- test analysis we can find that there is only significant difference in the using of compensation and social strategies between them and no evident distinction exists between the two groups when using metacognitive, cognitive, affective and memory strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanfeng Hu, 2009. "A Survey on the English Learning Strategy of the Rural High School Students and Urban High School Students," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 2(3), pages 232-232, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:2:y:2009:i:3:p:232
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/3722/3323
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/3722
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:2:y:2009:i:3:p:232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.