IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v2y2009i3p129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Video Segment Comprehension Strategies: Male and Female University Students

Author

Listed:
  • Lu-Fang Lin

Abstract

The purposes of the study were first to investigate the most and the least frequently employed strategies by English learners to understand video segments. Second, the study was to examine whether there are significant variation between both genders’ strategy usage. The researcher designed a video comprehension strategy questionnaire including cognitive, compensation, and memory categories. Totally, 168 Taiwanese university participants completed the questionnaire. The quantitative results demonstrate that there were no significant differences between males and females’ strategy use in the compensation strategy category. Regarding the memory strategy category, males relied more on their personal life experience, world knowledge and domain knowledge to comprehend video segments more than females. Females significantly preferred to remember the scene with Chinese. Regarding the cognitive strategy category, females tended to duplicate a series of sounds pronounced by speakers and understand the details more frequently than males. Instructional recommendations were presented for effective video comprehension instruction.

Suggested Citation

  • Lu-Fang Lin, 2009. "Video Segment Comprehension Strategies: Male and Female University Students," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 2(3), pages 129-129, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:2:y:2009:i:3:p:129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/2574/3285
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/2574
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:2:y:2009:i:3:p:129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.