IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v18y2025i6p78.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Investigation into EFL Students’ Perceptions towards the Integration of Automated Writing Evaluation in L2 Writing Classrooms: A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Chenxi Zeng

Abstract

Research has confirmed the effectiveness of integrating AWE (Automated Writing Evaluation) into L2 writing instruction and pedagogy. Yet, little research on students’ perceptions of integration has been conducted in terms of learning and assessment. To address the gap, the current study aimed to explore the perceptions of students regarding the integration of automated writing evaluation (AWE) systems. The research is grounded in the context of a case study, which provides a detailed examination of student attitudes and experiences with AWE tools within a specific educational setting. Data was gathered from classroom observation and a semi-structured interview with one focal participant. Key findings reveal that while the student acknowledged the convenience and immediate feedback provided by AWE systems, they also expressed concerns about the potential for reduced human interaction and the limitations of automated feedback in capturing the nuances of language learning. This case study contributes to the broader discourse on technology in writing instruction by providing empirical evidence on EFL students’ perceptions of AWE systems. It offers insights for educators, policymakers, and technologists on how to design and implement AWE tools that are responsive to the needs and perceptions of L2 writers.

Suggested Citation

  • Chenxi Zeng, 2025. "An Investigation into EFL Students’ Perceptions towards the Integration of Automated Writing Evaluation in L2 Writing Classrooms: A Case Study," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 18(6), pages 1-78, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:18:y:2025:i:6:p:78
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/0/0/51750/56284
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/0/51750
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:18:y:2025:i:6:p:78. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.