IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v18y2025i11p146.html

A Discourse Analysis of CSR Reports for Chinese and American Pharmaceutical Enterprises Based on Fairclough’s Three-dimensional Model

Author

Listed:
  • Tiantian Du
  • Siying Cai

Abstract

Based on Fairclough’s three-dimensional modelling framework, this paper presents a discourse analysis of the corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports of AbbVie and Hengrui, representative companies in the pharmaceutical field in the United States and China. At the textual analysis level, word frequency statistics are conducted on the report texts. Through keyword analysis, the focus of concern of the two companies is understood. At the discourse practice level, the process of report generation and understanding is explored in terms of data sources and case use. At the social practice level, the performance of the two companies in different cultural contexts is analysed to understand how cultural differences affect the companies’ image building. The study shows that AbbVie’s and Hengrui’s corporate images have common points- focusing on management, actively fulfilling social responsibility, and pursuing sustainable development. Whereas AbbVie is more inclined to show global vision and inclusiveness, Hengrui emphasises local authority and patriotism. By analysing the discourses of the two corporations’ CSR reports, it is possible to gain a deeper understanding of how corporations shape their corporate image through linguistic strategies and to reveal the cultural factors behind the differences in corporate image.

Suggested Citation

  • Tiantian Du & Siying Cai, 2025. "A Discourse Analysis of CSR Reports for Chinese and American Pharmaceutical Enterprises Based on Fairclough’s Three-dimensional Model," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 18(11), pages 146-146, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:18:y:2025:i:11:p:146
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/0/0/52392/57058
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/0/52392
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:18:y:2025:i:11:p:146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.