IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v16y2023i8p9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Comparative Impact of Focus on Forms vs. Focus on Form Instructions on the Receptive Skills of Reading and Listening: An Experimental Study of Iraqi Intermediate EFL Learners

Author

Listed:
  • Esmaeil Bagheridoust
  • Rasha Ihsan Saadoon

Abstract

This study was an attempt to investigate the effects of the two forms of instruction, namely, FonF and Fonfs on developing listening and reading abilities and skills of Iraqi intermediate EFL learners. The research is by nature a two dimensional study which covers both a macro study on teaching professionalism and micro study of learning development. Before starting the treatment, in order to test the homogeneousness of the students, a PET was piloted among 80 students being at the same language proficiency level of the main participants of this study and showed high reliability and validity indices. Subsequently, the listening and reading sections of IELTS test were administered to the selected participants of the study and then they were divided into three experimental and control groups receiving the treatments in one term of six weeks. The experimental groups were taught through the FonF and Fonfs teaching strategies and the conventional group enjoyed the routine classroom schedule and syllabus. The researchers employed independent samples t test and the results indicated significant difference among the mean rank of the experimental and control groups on the listening post-test (p = 0.049<0.05). Moreover, she used ANOVA and univariate analyses were used and the results indicated that there was a significant difference among the mean rank of the experimental groups on the use of FonF and Fonfs post-test. Therefore, the multiple comparisons exposed that teaching FonF was basically more operational for exercising reading skills and tasks in an EFL classroom than teaching Fonfs for developing listening skills. All in all, teaching either FonF or Fonfs can be to the benefit of Iranian EFL learners since the differences between the numerical values obtained have not been greatly different to reject the treatment effects of Fonfs.

Suggested Citation

  • Esmaeil Bagheridoust & Rasha Ihsan Saadoon, 2023. "The Comparative Impact of Focus on Forms vs. Focus on Form Instructions on the Receptive Skills of Reading and Listening: An Experimental Study of Iraqi Intermediate EFL Learners," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(8), pages 1-9, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:16:y:2023:i:8:p:9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/0/0/48971/52793
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/0/48971
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:16:y:2023:i:8:p:9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.