IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v16y2023i10p1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Perspectives of Suadi University Instructors and Learners on the Product and Process Approaches to Second-Language Writing

Author

Listed:
  • Hanan S. Alwaneen

Abstract

This study investigates instructors’ and learners’ perspectives on using the product and process approaches to teach second-language writing at a Saudi University, focusing on the variations in perspective between instructors and learners. To this end, the researcher undertook a mixed-method study. Two questionnaires, each consisting of ten items, were used to collect data from 72 participants (47.22% instructors, 52.78% learners); the data were analyzed using the independent samples t-test function of IBM SPSS statistics 28.0. In addition, semi-structured interviews with 12 participants (50% instructors, 50% learners) were conducted to gain a holistic picture. The overall findings reveal no statistically significant difference between instructors’ and learners’ perspectives on the product approach to second-language writing. However, the findings indicate a statistically significant difference in their perspectives on the process approach; instructors perceived the process approach to writing more positively than learners. The current study assists instructors in assessing whether their preferred teaching approach differs from that of their students, enabling them to adopt an ideal approach for both parties.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanan S. Alwaneen, 2023. "The Perspectives of Suadi University Instructors and Learners on the Product and Process Approaches to Second-Language Writing," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(10), pages 1-1, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:16:y:2023:i:10:p:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/0/0/49215/53093
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/0/49215
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:16:y:2023:i:10:p:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.