IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v15y2022i7p1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discrimination of L2 British English Monophthong Contrasts: The Case of L2 Thai Learners of English

Author

Listed:
  • Patchanok Kitikanan

Abstract

This article reports on the second language (L2) perception of contrasts among British English monophthongs. This study has two aims- 1) to explore the discriminability of contrasts in L2 British English monophthongs; and 2) to test the perceptual assimilation model-L2 (PAM-L2) towards the ability to discriminate British English contrasts. The contrasts considered were- /iË /-/ɪ/, /æ/-/ÊŒ/, /ÉœË /-/ÊŒ/, /uË /-/ÊŠ/, /e/-/æ/, /ÊŒ/-/É’/, /ÊŠ/-/É”Ë /, /É‘Ë /-/ÊŒ/, /ÉœË /-/É”Ë /. Fifty-two native speakers of Thai who were learning English as a foreign language in Thailand participated in a forced-choice ABX discrimination task. The participants were divided between two groups – those high-experienced and those low-experienced. The results evidence how both groups performed well on most contrasts (over 80% correct), except for /ÊŒ/-/É’/. Although the discriminability of the contrast /ÊŒ/-/É’/ was lower than with the other contrasts, the discrimination scores among both groups remained in a middle range (over 70%). No effect of L2 experience was found, thus suggesting that the abilities of both groups did not differ. The PAM-L2 was accurate in predicting that neither group of L2 Thai learners would have difficulty in discriminating the considered L2 sound contrasts. These results imply that the results gained from a perceptual assimilation task are useful in predicting the discriminability of L2 sound contrasts, as suggested by the PAM-L2.

Suggested Citation

  • Patchanok Kitikanan, 2022. "Discrimination of L2 British English Monophthong Contrasts: The Case of L2 Thai Learners of English," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(7), pages 1-1, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:15:y:2022:i:7:p:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/0/0/47312/50697
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/0/47312
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:15:y:2022:i:7:p:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.