IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v14y2021i5p23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying Guessing in English Language Tests via Rasch Fit Statistics: An Exploratory Study

Author

Listed:
  • David Coniam
  • Tony Lee
  • Leda Lampropoulou

Abstract

This article explores the issue of identifying guessers – with a specific focus on multiple-choice tests. Guessing has long been considered a problem due to the fact that it compromises validity. A test taker scoring higher than they should through guessing does not provide a picture of their actual ability. After an initial description of issues associated with guessing, the article then outlines approaches which have been taken to either discourage test takers from guessing or which attempt statistically to handle the problem. From this, the article moves to a novel way of identifying potential guessers- from the post hoc use of Rasch fit statistics. Two datasets, each consisting of approximately 200 beginner level English language test takers were split into two. In each dataset, half the test takers’ answers were randomised – to approximate guessing. Results obtained via a Rasch analysis of the data was then passed to an analyst who used the Rasch fit statistics to identify possible guessers. On each dataset, 80% of guessers were identified.

Suggested Citation

  • David Coniam & Tony Lee & Leda Lampropoulou, 2021. "Identifying Guessing in English Language Tests via Rasch Fit Statistics: An Exploratory Study," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(5), pages 1-23, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:14:y:2021:i:5:p:23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/0/0/45112/47797
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/0/45112
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:14:y:2021:i:5:p:23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.