IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v13y2020i7p140.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CA-informed Interactional Feature Analysis of Conversations in Textbooks Used for Teaching English Speaking in Thai Secondary Schools

Author

Listed:
  • Nasree Pitaksuksan
  • Kemtong Sinwongsuwat

Abstract

With Conversation Analysis (CA) insights, this paper examines the textbooks used to teach oral English communication to Thai EFL learners in secondary schools. In an attempt to raise the awareness of features of naturally-occurring conversation and help increase the learners’ exposure to these features, two textbook series, hereafter A and B, were purposively sampled for a close examination of their model conversations and related exercises. Six textbooks, three from each series, were obtained from secondary school teachers voluntarily joining a CA-informed English conversation-teaching workshop in lower southern Thailand. The findings showed that textbook series A contains action-driven, function-based communicative content, whereas B is theme/situation-based, being organized around topics or events likely faced by learners in daily life. Both textbook series put more focus on face-to-face dialogues, offering a significantly smaller number of phone and multi-party conversations. The model conversations in both series are presented with punctuation symbols of written language and without any representations of spoken language features such as stress and intonation. Some of the conversations in series B are sequentially incomplete, and while offering students conversations with various types of action sequences, both series can integrate more opening and closing sequences as well as sequences with dispreferred responses into their model conversations. To raise learners’ awareness of features of natural conversation, more instances of repair and overlap may also be integrated into both audio and printed materials. Finally, to achieve the communicative unit goal, more scaffolding exercises can be provided to allow students to practice not only word and sentence pronunciation in isolation, but in relation to achieving a particular interactional goal via the construction of turns in more manageable, meaningful sequences.

Suggested Citation

  • Nasree Pitaksuksan & Kemtong Sinwongsuwat, 2020. "CA-informed Interactional Feature Analysis of Conversations in Textbooks Used for Teaching English Speaking in Thai Secondary Schools," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(7), pages 140-140, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:13:y:2020:i:7:p:140
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/0/0/43134/45141
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/0/43134
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kornsak Tantiwich & Kemtong Sinwongsuwat, 2019. "Thai University Students’ Use of Yes/No Tokens in Spoken Interaction," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(3), pages 1-1, March.
    2. Attapol Khamkhien, 2010. "Teaching English Speaking and English Speaking Tests in the Thai Context: A Reflection from Thai Perspective," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 3(1), pages 184-184, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bunthan Teng & Kemtong Sinwongsuwat, 2015. "Teaching and Learning English in Thailand and the Integration of Conversation Analysis (CA) into the Classroom," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(3), pages 1-13, March.
    2. Alina Buzarna-Tihenea (Galbeaza), 2023. "Developing Speaking Skills through Debates. Case Study Proposal in Business English," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 190-197, December.
    3. Katsumasa Shinozuka & Setsue Shibata & Yumiko Mizusawa, 2017. "Effectiveness of Read-aloud Instruction on Motivation and Learning Strategy among Japanese College EFL Students," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(4), pages 1-1, April.
    4. Saksit Saengboon, 2013. "Thai English Teachers’ Understanding of “Postmethod Pedagogy†: Case Studies of University Lecturers," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 6(12), pages 156-156, December.
    5. Suphatha Rachayon & Kittitouch Soontornwipast, 2019. "The Effects of Task-based Instruction Using a Digital Game in a Flipped Learning Environment on English Oral Communication Ability of Thai Undergraduate Nursing Students," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(7), pages 1-12, July.
    6. repec:thr:techub:10014:y:2020:i:1:p:10-32 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Mahshad Safari & Mansour Koosha, 2016. "Instructional Efficacy of Portfolio for Assessing Iranian EFL Learners’ Speaking Ability," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(3), pages 102-102, March.
    8. Ayman Daif-Allah & Mohammad Khan, 2016. "The Impact of Open Discussion Sessions on Enhancing the Oral Communicative Abilities of Saudi English Language Majors at Buraydah Community College," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(6), pages 108-108, June.
    9. Mantana Meksophawannagul, 2015. "Teacher and Learner Views on Effective English Teaching in the Thai Context: The Case of Engineering Students," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(11), pages 1-99, November.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:13:y:2020:i:7:p:140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.