IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v13y2020i6p172.html

Do Saudi Learners of English Recognize the Benefits of Consciousness-raising Tasks and Communicative Tasks?

Author

Listed:
  • Adnan Mukhrib

Abstract

This study examined perceptions of students of the benefits of consciousness-raising tasks (CRT) and communicative tasks (CT) when compared with actual learning outcomes in a Saudi secondary school context. Qualitative data were collected from 60 Saudi speaking learners of English, at various proficiency levels, who had engaged in a sequence of collaborative speaking and writing tasks. The results showed the value of the TBL approach which was not in question but makes a significant contribution regarding the importance of the role of interaction in mixed ability groups. The findings indicate that there was a variation in outcomes particularly in terms of how the students perceived the benefits and contribution of the intervention type to their learning. In addition, there was a further impact from the sociolinguistic context of the interaction, which indicates the role of group dynamics and individual variations of Saudi learners. This implies that fluency and accuracy during sociolinguistic interaction is influenced by a wide range of features than cannot be assessed through traditional fluency measures alone. The findings therefore lend support for a TBL approach to maintain the development of fluency, accuracy, and learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Adnan Mukhrib, 2020. "Do Saudi Learners of English Recognize the Benefits of Consciousness-raising Tasks and Communicative Tasks?," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(6), pages 172-172, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:13:y:2020:i:6:p:172
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/0/0/42939/44899
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/0/42939
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hersong Tang & Jer-Shiou Chiou & Oliver Jarsaillon, 2015. "Efficacy of Task-Based Learning in a Chinese EFL Classroom: A Case Study," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(5), pages 168-168, May.
    2. Dalal A. Bahanshal, 2013. "The Effect of Large Classes on English Teaching and Learning in Saudi Secondary Schools," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 6(11), pages 1-49, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:12:p:2647-2654 is not listed on IDEAS

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thi Ly Kha Nguyen & Bao Trang Thi Nguyen, 2025. "Teaching English Paragraph Writing in EFL High School Contexts: Teachers’ Perceptions, their Classroom Practices and Students’ Voices," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 18(4), pages 1-49, April.
    2. Chuanpit Sriwichai, 2020. "Students’ Readiness and Problems in Learning English through Blended Learning Environment," Asian Journal of Education and Training, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 6(1), pages 23-34.
    3. Nor Hidayati Abdullah & Nur Hani Laily Ramli & Mahfuzah Rafek, 2017. "Mass lecture in language learning: What do the boys and girls think?," Journal of Advances in Humanities and Social Sciences, Dr. Yi-Hsing Hsieh, vol. 3(2), pages 115-123.
    4. Jerald C. Moneva & Leo B. Acibar & Niel O. Monding, 2020. "Class Size and Students’ Anxiety in Oral Recitation," Journal of Social Science Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 7(2), pages 15-28, December.
    5. Khalid Al-Seghayer, 2015. "Salient Key Features of Actual English Instructional Practices in Saudi Arabia," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(6), pages 1-89, June.
    6. Khaled Nasser Ali Al-Mwzaiji & Ahmad Abdullah Salih Muhammad, 2023. "EFL Learning and Vision 2030 in Saudi Arabia: A Critical Perspective," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 13(2), pages 435-435, March.
    7. Yuka Kataoka & Achmad Husni Thamrin & Rodney Van Meter, 2024. "ORP Gym: Online Oral Repetition Practice Support System for Large-scale Japanese-Speaking Courses Abroad," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 37(4), pages 413-439, August.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:13:y:2020:i:6:p:172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.