IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v13y2020i2p97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Study of English Learning Beliefs between Chinese and Korean College Students in Minority Region

Author

Listed:
  • Haiying Yan

Abstract

Beliefs are a central construct in every discipline. Meanwhile, students’ beliefs about language learning play an important role in their language motivation, attitude and achievement. This study intends to explore the current situation of the English learning beliefs of College students in Minority Regions in China and then attempts to find out the similarities and differences in English learning beliefs between Chinese and Korean students. The results show that self-efficacy is the most important factor affecting non-English major sophomores of minority regions. And there are clear differences exist between two sub-scales of English learning beliefs.

Suggested Citation

  • Haiying Yan, 2020. "Comparative Study of English Learning Beliefs between Chinese and Korean College Students in Minority Region," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(2), pages 1-97, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:13:y:2020:i:2:p:97
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/0/0/41847/43482
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/0/41847
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thomas S. Jeffery, 2022. "Cultural Differences in EFL Teaching Methods between Korean and Non-Korean Teachers," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(1), pages 1-53, January.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:13:y:2020:i:2:p:97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.