IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v12y2019i1p98.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving EFL Learners’ Critical Thinking Skills in Argumentative Writing

Author

Listed:
  • Nabila Nejmaoui

Abstract

In the 21st century where information has become easily available and accessible, education has shifted its attention to teaching students how to process and think critically about the information they receive. Welcoming the changes that education constantly witnesses, the field of English Language Teaching (ELT) has embraced the integration of critical thinking. Accordingly, the present paper aims to explore the effect, if any, of integrating critical thinking on learners’ use of critical thinking skills in argumentative writing. To this end, an experimental study was conducted; 36 Moroccan EFL learners from the department of English were divided evenly into an experimental group and a control group. While the participants in the experimental group were taught writing with critical thinking skills, the others were taught writing with no reference to these skills. The participants in both groups took a pre-test and posttest to evaluate the development of their use of critical thinking skills in argumentative writing. The data which has been quantitatively analyzed indicates that the experimental group significantly outperformed the control group. The students’ ability to use more credible evidence, address alternative arguments, support conclusions, and maintain the logical flow of ideas in their essays did not reach a mastery level in the posttest, yet the average level they reached is reassuring in view of the short time of the training they had. An integration of CT for longer periods may bring forth encouraging outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Nabila Nejmaoui, 2019. "Improving EFL Learners’ Critical Thinking Skills in Argumentative Writing," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(1), pages 1-98, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:12:y:2019:i:1:p:98
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/0/0/37848/38268
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/0/37848
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tian Dong & Lu Yue, 2015. "A Study on Critical Thinking Assessment System of College English Writing," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(11), pages 176-176, November.
    2. Zhengwei Pei & Chaoqun Zheng & Meng Zhang & Fangzhou Liu, 2017. "Critical Thinking and Argumentative Writing: Inspecting the Association among EFL Learners in China," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(10), pages 1-31, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      JEL classification:

      • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
      • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:12:y:2019:i:1:p:98. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.