IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v11y2018i3p119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of X-Word Grammar and Traditional Grammar Instruction on Grammatical Accuracy

Author

Listed:
  • Sue Livingston
  • Andi Toce
  • Cyndi Casey
  • Fernando Montoya
  • Bonny Hart
  • Carmela O’Flaherty

Abstract

This study first briefly describes an instructional approach to teaching grammar known as X-Word Grammar and then compares its effectiveness in assisting students in achieving grammatical accuracy with traditionally taught grammar. Two groups of L2 pre-college students were taught using curricula and practice procedures in two different grammar texts over a three-month period of time for 20% of their class time. Essays written at three different times were analyzed for the correct and incorrect use of sentence patterns and verb constructs. Results demonstrated that improvement (writing with less error) was larger in both categories for the X-Word Grammar group and significant for two verb constructs as compared to the traditional grammar group, indicating that X-Word Grammar students wrote more accurately in month three than they did in month one of the study when compared with students in the traditional grammar group. Possible reasons for these results are discussed in light of the differences in the two approaches and how these differences support the literature on ways of improving grammar instruction.

Suggested Citation

  • Sue Livingston & Andi Toce & Cyndi Casey & Fernando Montoya & Bonny Hart & Carmela O’Flaherty, 2018. "Effect of X-Word Grammar and Traditional Grammar Instruction on Grammatical Accuracy," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(3), pages 119-119, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:11:y:2018:i:3:p:119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/73698/40477
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/73698
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:11:y:2018:i:3:p:119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.