IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v11y2018i12p93.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Contrastive Study on the Application of Mind Maps in Argumentative Writing Instruction for EFL Learners

Author

Listed:
  • Ying Zhang

Abstract

This study is aimed at exploring the relationship between explicit instruction of mind mapping at pre-writing stage and the quality of Chinese EFL learners’ argumentative writing. Thirty-nine first-year English majors from two convenient classes were randomly assigned into the experimental group and the control group respectively. For the control group, the traditional way of teaching writing was adopted, while for the experimental group, the application of mind mapping was integrated into the writing instruction. Five participants from the experimental group participated in the following interview. The comparison of mean scores of post-experimental argumentative writings between two groups indicated that the experimental group significantly performed better than the control group in content and organization of their writings. Through the analysis of interviews, it was found that participants regarded mind mapping as a useful tool for planning their writing and their personal attitudes toward English writing became more positive. The findings provide EFL teachers and curriculum designers with useful insights into improving the efficiency of writing instruction.

Suggested Citation

  • Ying Zhang, 2018. "A Contrastive Study on the Application of Mind Maps in Argumentative Writing Instruction for EFL Learners," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(12), pages 1-93, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:11:y:2018:i:12:p:93
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/0/0/37456/37766
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/0/37456
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:11:y:2018:i:12:p:93. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.