IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v10y2017i11p204.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

EFL Teachers’ Perceptions of Strategy Deficiency Syndrome: A Grounded Theory Study

Author

Listed:
  • Seyyed Ostovar-Namaghi
  • Bahareh Ahmadabadi-Tak

Abstract

Strategy-deficient language learners struggle to develop their language proficiency through limiting and inappropriate strategies. This study aims at exploring experienced teachers’ perceptions of strategy deficiency syndrome among EFL learners. To this end, the perspectives of a purposive sample of experienced teachers teaching in private language schools of Tehran, the capital city of Iran, were theoretically sampled based on the principles and procedures of grounded theory. The final conceptualization of teachers’ perspectives yielded “learners’ limiting strategies†and “teachers proposed alternatives†as the major categories. The findings suggest that curriculum developers and language teachers merge strategy training and language teaching to remedy the strategy deficiency syndrome among EFL learners in the contexts of this study and other similar contexts where the banking model of education marginalizes strategy training and focuses exclusively on language teaching.

Suggested Citation

  • Seyyed Ostovar-Namaghi & Bahareh Ahmadabadi-Tak, 2017. "EFL Teachers’ Perceptions of Strategy Deficiency Syndrome: A Grounded Theory Study," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(11), pages 204-204, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:10:y:2017:i:11:p:204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/71337/38934
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/71337
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:10:y:2017:i:11:p:204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.