IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibf/beaccr/v8y2016i1p1-14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutionalizing And Standardizing Assessment Methodology For Multiple Accreditation Agencies

Author

Listed:
  • Natalya Delcoure
  • Martha L. Sale
  • Genevieve Scalan

Abstract

After successfully maintaining ACBSP accreditation and subsequently adding the attainment of AACSB accreditation as an important objective, the College of Business Administration at Texas A & M University– Kingsville is institutionalizing and standardizing student learning outcome assessment. The business education accrediting bodies place great emphasis on student learning outcomes assessment and on using the results of assessment activities to fuel continuous improvement; however, the administration of these assessment activities varies widely. The purpose of this investigation is to discuss the implementation of institutionalizing an assessment methodology and standardizing the assessment process for multiple assessment agencies at College of Business Administration at Texas A & M University–Kingsville

Suggested Citation

  • Natalya Delcoure & Martha L. Sale & Genevieve Scalan, 2016. "Institutionalizing And Standardizing Assessment Methodology For Multiple Accreditation Agencies," Business Education and Accreditation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibf:beaccr:v:8:y:2016:i:1:p:1-14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.theibfr2.com/RePEc/ibf/beaccr/bea-v8n1-2016/BEA-V8N1-2016-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Assessment Culture; Business Education Accreditation; Multiple Accreditors; Standardizing Assessment; Assessment Continuous Improvement;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I20 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - General
    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibf:beaccr:v:8:y:2016:i:1:p:1-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mercedes Jalbert (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.