IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i10p1904-d115953.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Rebound Hammer Test for Rammed Earth Material

Author

Listed:
  • Quoc-Bao Bui

    (Sustainable Developments in Civil Engineering Research Group, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 70000, Vietnam)

Abstract

Rammed-earth (RE) is a construction material manufactured from the soil. The soil is compacted at its optimum water content, inside a formwork to build a monolithic wall. RE material is attracting renewed interest throughout the world thanks to its sustainable characteristics: low embodied energy, substantial thermal inertia, and natural regulator of moisture; on the other hand, the existing historic RE buildings is still numerous. This is why several research studies have been carried out recently to study different aspects of this material. However, few investigations have been carried out to explore the possibility of applying the nondestructive techniques on RE walls. This paper presents an assessment of the well-known rebound hammer test on RE walls. The calibration curves of the rebound hammer test have been established for conventional concrete where the rebound number is more than 20. For RE material with lower compressive strengths, a new calibration curve must be established. In the present study, two soils were used and different homogenized specimens with different dry densities were manufactured and tested, to plot a general calibration curve. Then, this calibration curve was applied to RE specimens; different results at different positions in an earthen layer were observed, due to the inhomogeneity of the material. The final results showed an acceptable accuracy of the calibration curve in the prediction of the compressive strength of RE material.

Suggested Citation

  • Quoc-Bao Bui, 2017. "Assessing the Rebound Hammer Test for Rammed Earth Material," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-10, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:10:p:1904-:d:115953
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/10/1904/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/10/1904/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruifeng Liang & Gangarao Hota & Ying Lei & Yanhao Li & Daniel Stanislawski & Yongqiang Jiang, 2013. "Nondestructive Evaluation of Historic Hakka Rammed Earth Structures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Paul Jaquin, 2012. "Influence of Arabic and Chinese Rammed Earth Techniques in the Himalayan Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(10), pages 1-11, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jacinto Canivell & Juan Jesús Martín-del-Río & Raúl M. Falcón & Carlos Rubio-Bellido, 2020. "Rammed Earth Construction: A Proposal for a Statistical Quality Control in the Execution Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-22, April.
    2. Quoc-Bao Bui & Tan-Trung Bui & Mai-Phuong Tran & Thi-Loan Bui & Hoang-An Le, 2019. "Assessing the Seismic Behavior of Rammed Earth Walls with an L-Form Cross-Section," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuan Sun & Zhu Wang & Yuan Zheng, 2022. "Environmental Adaptations for Achieving Sustainable Regeneration: A Conceptual Design Analysis on Built Heritage Fujian Tulous," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-14, September.
    2. Richard M. Yelland, 2013. "History Made for Tomorrow: Hakka Tulou," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(11), pages 1-12, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:10:p:1904-:d:115953. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.