IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v7y2015i5p5682-5704d49338.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scaling-up Strategy as an Appropriate Approach for Sustainable New Town Development? Lessons from Wujin, Changzhou, China

Author

Listed:
  • Hao Chen

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China)

  • Qiyan Wu

    (School of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China
    Key Laboratory of Environment Change and Resources Use in Beibu Gulf (Ministry of Education) Nanning 530001, China)

  • Jianquan Cheng

    (School of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China
    School of Science and the Environment, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M1 5GD, UK)

  • Zhifei Ma

    (Department of Geography, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China)

  • Weixuan Song

    (Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China)

Abstract

China has achieved rapid urbanization and unprecedented economic booming over the past three decades. Numerous cities and towns dreamed of cloning the miracles of Shenzhen and Pudong, Shanghai, in terms of their international development. However, inappropriate development strategies have meant that the majority of fast expanding urban suburbs or newly developed towns suffer a high ratio of vacant dwellings in real estate markets and a massive loss of farmland. The frequent exposure of these empty cities to mass media or the public has urged urban governments to impose fiscal austerity. These unexpected and negative consequences of urban development have explicit conflicts with sustainability. This paper aims to provide a political economy view of these unsustainable outcomes of new development. To achieve this, the processes and agendas of new city or town planning in Wujin District, Changzhou City, are analyzed and evaluated from the perspective of scale theory. Extensive interviews conducted with local politicians at different levels, planners, real estate agents and local residents facilitate the interpretation of these processes and agendas. It is argued that the legends of Shenzhen and Pudong, Shanghai originate from a modified neoliberal capitalism intervention at the right time and place, with which other peer cities are not comparable. It is concluded that the scaling-up strategy is not appropriate for the local new town development of Wujin, which has led to unsustainable outcomes—empty cities and towns—and created important lessons for the sustainable development of Chinese cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Hao Chen & Qiyan Wu & Jianquan Cheng & Zhifei Ma & Weixuan Song, 2015. "Scaling-up Strategy as an Appropriate Approach for Sustainable New Town Development? Lessons from Wujin, Changzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-23, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:5:p:5682-5704:d:49338
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/5/5682/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/5/5682/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philip McCann & Zoltán J. Ács, 2015. "Globalization: Countries, Cities and Multinationals," Chapters, in: Global Entrepreneurship, Institutions and Incentives, chapter 19, pages 371-386, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Chengri Ding & Erik Lichtenberg, 2011. "Land And Urban Economic Growth In China," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(2), pages 299-317, May.
    3. Nicholas R. Lardy, 2012. "Sustaining China's Economic Growth after the Global Financial Crisis," Peterson Institute Press: All Books, Peterson Institute for International Economics, number 6260, October.
    4. Jieming Zhu, 1999. "Local Growth Coalition: The Context and Implications of China’s Gradualist Urban Land Reforms," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(3), pages 534-548, September.
    5. Neil Brenner, 1999. "Globalisation as Reterritorialisation: The Re-scaling of Urban Governance in the European Union," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 36(3), pages 431-451, March.
    6. Jiang Xu & Anthony G.O. Yeh, 2005. "City Repositioning and Competitiveness Building in Regional Development: New Development Strategies in Guangzhou, China," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 283-308, June.
    7. Si-Ming Li, 2012. "Housing Inequalities under Market Deepening: The Case of Guangzhou, China," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(12), pages 2852-2866, December.
    8. John Friedmann, 1986. "The World City Hypothesis," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 17(1), pages 69-83, January.
    9. Kathryn Davidson & Brendan Gleeson, 2014. "The Sustainability of an Entrepreneurial City?," International Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 173-191, May.
    10. Aidan While & Andrew E. G. Jonas & David Gibbs, 2004. "The environment and the entrepreneurial city: searching for the urban ‘sustainability fix’ in Manchester and Leeds," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 549-569, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Meiqing, 2016. "From New Town to 'Ghost Town': Lessons from the Cases in Yangtze River Delta," SocArXiv 6fhdn, Center for Open Science.
    2. Chunhui Liu & Weixuan Song & Chen Zhou, 2017. "Unsuccessful Urban Governance of Brownfield Land Redevelopment: A Lesson from the Toxic Soil Event in Changzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-14, May.
    3. Fan Zhang & Nengsheng Luo & Yanfei Li, 2023. "What Type of Energy Structure Improves Eco-Efficiency? A Study Based on Statistical Data of 285 Prefecture-Level Entities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-26, June.
    4. Hui Zou & Xuejun Duan & Lei Ye & Lei Wang, 2017. "Locating Sustainability Issues: Identification of Ecological Vulnerability in Mainland China’s Mega-Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Liang Zhuang & Chao Ye, 2018. "Disorder or Reorder? The Spatial Production of State-Level New Areas in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-15, October.
    6. Rahmat Aris Pratomo & D. Ary A. Samsura & Erwin van der Krabben, 2022. "Living on the Edge: Comparing the Quality of Life Transformation of Local Communities Induced by New Town Development in Different Peri-Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-24, October.
    7. Jianglong Chen & Jinlong Gao & Feng Yuan, 2016. "Growth Type and Functional Trajectories: An Empirical Study of Urban Expansion in Nanjing, China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, February.
    8. Zhou, Changchang & Chan, Roger C.K., 2022. "State-scalar politics of rural land reform in China: The case of Wujin district," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    9. Qiyan Wu & Jianquan Cheng, 2019. "A temporally cyclic growth model of urban spatial morphology in China: Evidence from Kunming Metropolis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(8), pages 1533-1553, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiang Xu & Anthony Yeh, 2009. "Decoding Urban Land Governance: State Reconstruction in Contemporary Chinese Cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(3), pages 559-581, March.
    2. Anthony Goerzen & Christian Geisler Asmussen & Bo Bernhard Nielsen, 2024. "Global cities, the liability of foreignness, and theory on place and space in international business," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 55(1), pages 10-27, February.
    3. O'Connor, Kevin & Fuellhart, Kurt, 2013. "Change in air services at second rank cities," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 26-30.
    4. Jonathan Rutherford, 2005. "Networks in Cities, Cities in Networks: Territory and Globalisation Intertwined in Telecommunications Infrastructure Development in Europe," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(13), pages 2389-2406, December.
    5. Diane E. Davis & Kian Tajbakhsh, 2005. "Globalization and Cities in Comparative Perspective," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 89-91, March.
    6. Paul Waley, 2007. "Tokyo-as-World-City: Reassessing the Role of Capital and the State in Urban Restructuring," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(8), pages 1465-1490, July.
    7. Gao, Jinlong & Chen, Wen & Yuan, Feng, 2017. "Spatial restructuring and the logic of industrial land redevelopment in urban China: I. Theoretical considerations," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 604-613.
    8. Shiuh-Shen Chien, 2008. "The Isomorphism of Local Development Policy: A Case Study of the Formation and Transformation of National Development Zones in Post-Mao Jiangsu, China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(2), pages 273-294, February.
    9. Miaoxi Zhao & Xingjian Liu & Ben Derudder & Ye Zhong & Wei Shen, 2015. "Mapping producer services networks in mainland Chinese cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(16), pages 3018-3034, December.
    10. Iris Claus & Les Oxley & Jie Chen & Xuehui Han, 2014. "The Evolution Of The Housing Market And Its Socioeconomic Impacts In The Post-Reform People'S Republic Of China: A Survey Of The Literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(4), pages 652-670, September.
    11. David Bell & Jon Binnie, 2004. "Authenticating Queer Space: Citizenship, Urbanism and Governance," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(9), pages 1807-1820, August.
    12. Schroeter, Eckhard & Roeber, Manfred, 2004. "Governing the Capital — Comparing Institutional Reform in Berlin, London and Paris," Institute of European Studies, Working Paper Series qt9km4z5vf, Institute of European Studies, UC Berkeley.
    13. Martijn J. Burger & Frank G. Oort, 2014. "International Handbook of Globalization and World Cities , edited by Ben Derudder , Michael Hoyler , Peter J. Taylor , and Frank Witlox . 2012 . Cheltenham, U.K. and Northampton, Massachusetts : Edwar," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 348-351, March.
    14. Dan Lin, 2019. "Urban Growth-Oriented Green Accumulation: Ecological Conservation Planning in the Shenzhen DaPeng Peninsula in Southern China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-24, January.
    15. Giuseppe Mazzeo, 2012. "Impact of high speed trains on the hierarchy of European cities," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 32(2), pages 159-173, September.
    16. Khan Shahed & Khan Megumi & Kyung An Sang, 2019. "Response to urban challenges by global cities within developmental states: The case of Tokyo and Seoul," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 55(4), pages 369-390, December.
    17. Edoardo Bruno, 2022. "Socio-Spatial ‘Tabula Rasa’ and Punctual Preservation: The Case Study of Measurable Compensation in Lijiao Village," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-27, July.
    18. Jin, Wanfu & Zhou, Chunshan & Zhang, Guojun, 2020. "Characteristics of state-owned construction land supply in Chinese cities by development stage and industry," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    19. Dillip Kumar Das, 2016. "Engendering Creative City Image by Using Information Communication Technology in Developing Countries," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(3), pages 1-12.
    20. Shenghua Lu & Hui Wang, 2022. "Limited Decentralization: Understand China’s Land System from the Perspective of Central-Local Relation," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-15, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:5:p:5682-5704:d:49338. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.