IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v6y2014i10p6781-6798d40770.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ecotourism Environmental Protection Measures and Their Effects on Protected Areas in China

Author

Listed:
  • Ling-en Wang

    (Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, China Academy of Science, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Linsheng Zhong

    (Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, China Academy of Science, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Yangjian Zhang

    (Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, China Academy of Science, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Bin Zhou

    (Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, China Academy of Science, Beijing 100101, China)

Abstract

Ecological and environmental protection is the core content of ecotourism development. A quantitative evaluation of the effects of ecotourism environmental protection (hereinafter referred to as EEP) measures on protected areas is conducive to a deeper understanding of the key issues related to ecotourism development in China, thus providing the theoretical basis for formulating the relevant national policies of sustainable ecotourism development in China. This paper first discusses the evaluation index system and then establishes an index evaluation model of EEP measures and their effects on protected areas. Using surveys of more than 1110 protected areas in 27 provinces (autonomous regions or municipalities), we evaluated the EEP measures and their effects from a quantitative and spatial perspective. The completeness of EEP measures for Chinese protected areas was moderately effective, and the implementation status of the protection measures varied with the protection region. The effectiveness of EEP measures in different provinces and regions showed significant differences. The effectiveness decreased from east to west. The evaluation index values of the environmental protection measures displayed a high correlation with the effects of environmental protection on protected areas. The ecological protection measures should be further improved and strengthened according to their regional differences during ecotourism development.

Suggested Citation

  • Ling-en Wang & Linsheng Zhong & Yangjian Zhang & Bin Zhou, 2014. "Ecotourism Environmental Protection Measures and Their Effects on Protected Areas in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(10), pages 1-18, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:6:y:2014:i:10:p:6781-6798:d:40770
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/10/6781/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/10/6781/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jaafar, Mastura & Maideen, Siti Aishah, 2012. "Ecotourism-related products and activities, and the economic sustainability of small and medium island chalets," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 683-691.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Riyan Mohammed Sahahiri & Amy L. Griffin & Qian (Chayn) Sun, 2023. "Investigating Ecotourism Opportunities Measurements in a Complex Adaptive System: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Yanpeng Li & Lixiang Zhang & Ying Gao & Zhipang Huang & Liangwei Cui & Shuoran Liu & Yihao Fang & Guopeng Ren & Davide Fornacca & Wen Xiao, 2019. "Ecotourism in China, Misuse or Genuine Development? An Analysis Based on Map Browser Results," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-15, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Quan Zhou & Kai Zhu & Ling Kang & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2023. "Tea Culture Tourism Perception: A Study on the Harmony of Importance and Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Kanokporn Swangjang & Phitwalan Kornpiphat, 2021. "Does ecotourism in a Mangrove area at Klong Kone, Thailand, conform to sustainable tourism? A case study using SWOT and DPSIR," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(11), pages 15960-15985, November.
    3. Yuqing Zhang & Chengcheng Zhan & Hui Wang & Ya Gao, 2022. "Evolution and reconstruction of settlement space in tourist islands: a case study of Dachangshan Island, Changhai County," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(8), pages 9777-9808, August.
    4. Rose Queiroz & José Guerreiro & Maria Ventura, 2014. "Demand of the tourists visiting protected areas in small oceanic islands: the Azores case-study (Portugal)," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 16(5), pages 1119-1135, October.
    5. Md. Anowar Hossain Bhuiyan & Chamhuri Siwar & Shaharuddin Mohamad Ismail, 2016. "Sustainability Measurement for Ecotourism Destination in Malaysia: A Study on Lake Kenyir, Terengganu," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 128(3), pages 1029-1045, September.
    6. Cinzia Battistella & Maria Rosita Cagnina & Lucia Cicero & Nadia Preghenella, 2018. "Sustainable Business Models of SMEs: Challenges in Yacht Tourism Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, September.
    7. Xiaocheng Vicky Zhang & Suk Ha Grace Chan, 2021. "Do Knowledge and Experience Value Affect Green Tourism Activity Participation and Buying Decision? A Case Study of Natural Dyeing Experience in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, July.
    8. Jakaria Dasan & Fatimah Ahmedy & Shamezah Shamsul & Elia Godoong & Coswald Stephen Sipaut & Mohammad Saffree Jeffree, 2022. "Post-COVID-19 Challenges for a Sustainable Community-Based Ecotourism: A Case Study of Rural Community in Sabah, North of Borneo," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, December.
    9. Kumju Hwang & Jieun Lee, 2018. "Antecedents and Consequences of Ecotourism Behavior: Independent and Interdependent Self-Construals, Ecological Belief, Willingness to Pay for Ecotourism Services and Satisfaction with Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    10. Ling-Zhong Lin & Chi-Fang Lu, 2013. "Fuzzy Group Decision-Making in the Measurement of Ecotourism Sustainability Potential," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 1051-1079, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:6:y:2014:i:10:p:6781-6798:d:40770. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.