IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i7p2639-d1362360.html

Approaches, Trends, and Gaps in Community-Based Ecotourism Research: A Bibliometric Analysis of Publications between 2002 and 2022

Author

Listed:
  • Mayerly Alexandra Guerrero-Moreno

    (Postgraduate Program in Society, Nature and Development (PPGSND), Institute of Biodiversity and Forests (IBEF), Federal University of Western Pará (UFOPA), Vera Paz Street, n/a (Tapajós Unit) Salé District, Santarém 68040-255, PA, Brazil)

  • José Max Barbosa Oliveira-Junior

    (Postgraduate Program in Society, Nature and Development (PPGSND), Institute of Biodiversity and Forests (IBEF), Federal University of Western Pará (UFOPA), Vera Paz Street, n/a (Tapajós Unit) Salé District, Santarém 68040-255, PA, Brazil
    Environmental Impact Studies Laboratory (LEIA), Institute of Water Sciences and Technology (ICTA), Federal University of Western Pará (UFOPA), Vera Paz Street, n/a (Tapajós Unit) Salé District, Santarém 68040-255, PA, Brazil)

Abstract

Community-based ecotourism (CBET) has emerged as an alternative that seeks to integrate environmental, cultural, social, and economic sustainability through community participation, generating increasing interest in research. In this context, we conducted a bibliometric analysis to understand the research patterns, trends, and gaps associated with scientific production on CBET between 2002 and 2022. To achieve this, articles related to CBET and its variants were extracted from Scopus and Web of Science. A total of 1145 publications were selected. Sustainability is the journal with the most articles published on CBET. The countries with the highest scientific production were the USA and China. Most of the studies were conducted in protected areas. The most used data sources are interviews and case studies. The field research focused on evaluating impacts and identifying perceptions, attitudes, or experiences. Despite the recent increase in the number of publications, there are still gaps related to the inclusion of indigenous populations, the use of quantitative methods in the research, the evaluation of the impact of CBET on biodiversity conservation, and the disparity between countries leading academic production and those developing CBET initiatives. These patterns and gaps suggest areas of opportunity for future research, strategies, and policies in the field of CBET.

Suggested Citation

  • Mayerly Alexandra Guerrero-Moreno & José Max Barbosa Oliveira-Junior, 2024. "Approaches, Trends, and Gaps in Community-Based Ecotourism Research: A Bibliometric Analysis of Publications between 2002 and 2022," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-21, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:2639-:d:1362360
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/2639/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/2639/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donthu, Naveen & Kumar, Satish & Mukherjee, Debmalya & Pandey, Nitesh & Lim, Weng Marc, 2021. "How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 285-296.
    2. Jaafar, Mastura & Maideen, Siti Aishah, 2012. "Ecotourism-related products and activities, and the economic sustainability of small and medium island chalets," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 683-691.
    3. Webster, Craig & Ivanov, Stanislav, 2014. "Transforming competitiveness into economic benefits: Does tourism stimulate economic growth in more competitive destinations?," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 137-140.
    4. Wang, Ju-Han Zoe, 2019. "National parks in China: Parks for people or for the nation?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 825-833.
    5. Alonso Rodríguez-Navarro & Ricardo Brito, 2022. "The link between countries’ economic and scientific wealth has a complex dependence on technological activity and research policy," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(5), pages 2871-2896, May.
    6. Kanokporn Swangjang & Phitwalan Kornpiphat, 2021. "Does ecotourism in a Mangrove area at Klong Kone, Thailand, conform to sustainable tourism? A case study using SWOT and DPSIR," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(11), pages 15960-15985, November.
    7. Junwen Zhu & Weishu Liu, 2020. "A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 123(1), pages 321-335, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:10:p:10134-10151 is not listed on IDEAS

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shuangqing Sheng & Wei Song & Hua Lian & Lei Ning, 2022. "Review of Urban Land Management Based on Bibliometrics," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-25, November.
    2. Gaurav Mitra & Vandana Gupta & Gaurav Gupta, 2025. "A systematic literature review on the determinants of corporate governance for firm performance: evidence from India," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(4), pages 941-990, December.
    3. Abidin Kemeç & Ayşenur Tarakcıoglu Altınay, 2023. "Sustainable Energy Research Trend: A Bibliometric Analysis Using VOSviewer, RStudio Bibliometrix, and CiteSpace Software Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    4. Dušan Nikolić & Dragan Ivanović & Lidija Ivanović, 2024. "An open-source tool for merging data from multiple citation databases," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(7), pages 4573-4595, July.
    5. Packiaraj Thangavel & Bibhas Chandra, 2023. "Two Decades of M-Commerce Consumer Research: A Bibliometric Analysis Using R Biblioshiny," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-32, August.
    6. Anibal Alviz-Meza & Ángel Darío González-Delgado, 2025. "Evolution of Bioeconomy Models and Computational Process Simulation in the Avocado Industry: A Bibliometric Analysis (2004–2023)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-25, February.
    7. Gricelda Herrera-Franco & Néstor Montalván-Burbano & Carlos Mora-Frank & Lady Bravo-Montero, 2021. "Scientific Research in Ecuador: A Bibliometric Analysis," Publications, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-34, December.
    8. Jiawei Wu & Xunrong Ye & Huachun Cui, 2025. "Recycled Materials in Construction: Trends, Status, and Future of Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-38, March.
    9. S. Lacárcel, Francisco Javier & González-Padilla, P. & Matos, Nelson & B. Correia, Marisol, 2024. "Bibliometric measurement of the resource curse and its implication for sustainable development," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    10. Horácio Ferreira & Carla Susana Marques & Luis Farinha, 2026. "Regional Smart Specialisation Strategies: A Systematic Literature Review," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 17(1), pages 3032-3059, February.
    11. Koubaa El Euch Hasna & Ben Said Foued & Jallouli Rim, 2025. "Privacy and security in mobile technology: A bibliometric analysis for marketing strategies," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 20(3), pages 28-47.
    12. Marta Ferrer-Serrano & Lucio Fuentelsaz & M. Pilar Latorre-Martínez, 2026. "Knowledge Transfer and Networks: A Bibliometric Approach Through Performance Analysis, Science mapping, and Dynamic Network Analysis," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 17(2), pages 5237-5272, April.
    13. Georgios Lampropoulos, 2025. "Intelligent Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality Technologies: An Overview," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-25, February.
    14. Luiza Loredana Năstase, 2025. "Sustainable Education and University Students’ Well-Being in the Digital Age: A Mixed-Methods Study on Problematic Smartphone Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-34, June.
    15. Valentina Della Corte & Giovanna Del Gaudio & Fabiana Sepe & Simone Luongo, 2021. "Destination Resilience and Innovation for Advanced Sustainable Tourism Management: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-19, November.
    16. Shufen Pang & Mazlinawati Abdul Majid & Hadinnapola Appuhamilage Chintha Crishanthi Perera & Mohammad Saydul Islam Sarkar & Jia Ning & Weikang Zhai & Ran Guo & Yuncheng Deng & Haiwen Zhang, 2024. "A Systematic Review and Global Trends on Blue Carbon and Sustainable Development: A Bibliometric Study from 2012 to 2023," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-31, March.
    17. Büşra Ayan & Elif Güner & Semen Son-Turan, 2022. "Blockchain Technology and Sustainability in Supply Chains and a Closer Look at Different Industries: A Mixed Method Approach," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-39, December.
    18. Yuntao Lian & Jiafeng Xie, 2024. "The Evolution of Digital Cultural Heritage Research: Identifying Key Trends, Hotspots, and Challenges through Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-39, August.
    19. Daniel Fonseca Costa & Brenda Melissa Fonseca & Lélis Pedro Andrade & Bruno César Melo Moreira, 2023. "Bibliometric and scientometric analysis of the scientific field in taxation," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-28, January.
    20. Sabando-Vera, David & Montalván-Burbano, Néstor & Parrales-Guerrero, Katherine & Yonfá-Medranda, Marcela & Plaza-Úbeda, José Antonio, 2025. "Growing a greener future: A bibliometric analysis of green innovation in SMEs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:2639-:d:1362360. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.