IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v5y2013i9p3992-4023d28979.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Methodological Framework Based on the Dynamic-Evolutionary View of Heritage

Author

Listed:
  • Iva Mrak

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Radmile Matejčić 3, Rijeka 51000, Croatia)

Abstract

The paper describes the shifting perspective from the contemplative view to the dynamic-evolutionary view of heritage and the main characteristics of the resulting multi-criterial decision-aid tool for the evaluation of heritage. With the integration of conservation in planning processes and with opening of the procedures to public participation, there is a need for decision-aid tools that can help increase rationality and transparency in decision-making processes related to planning. By understanding the contemporary view of heritage and the landscape, it is possible to create tools capable of accounting for spatial complexity and the extant cultural, social, historic and economic relations. With this in mind, a specific tool was created that can be used for the analysis, diagnosis, evaluation and monitoring of spatial heritage (registered and under consideration for protection), identifying opportunities, defining strategies for heritage management processes, and in the creation and evaluation of development and management scenarios. The paper illustrates a shift in the consideration of heritage in spatial planning and presents an application of the developed model in a case study.

Suggested Citation

  • Iva Mrak, 2013. "A Methodological Framework Based on the Dynamic-Evolutionary View of Heritage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(9), pages 1-32, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:5:y:2013:i:9:p:3992-4023:d:28979
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/5/9/3992/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/5/9/3992/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hinloopen, E. & Nijkamp, P., 1986. "Qualitative multiple criteria choice analysis : the dominant regime method," Serie Research Memoranda 0045, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cristina Coscia & Giulia Lazzari & Irene Rubino, 2018. "Values, Memory, and the Role of Exploratory Methods for Policy-Design Processes and the Sustainable Redevelopment of Waterfront Contexts: The Case of Officine Piaggio (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Isabella M. Lami & Stefano Moroni, 2020. "How Can I Help You? Questioning the Role of Evaluation Techniques in Democratic Decision-Making Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Papadopoulou, Maria P. & Antoniou, Constantinos, 2014. "Environmental impact assessment methodological framework for liquefied natural gas terminal and transport network planning," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 306-319.
    2. P Nijkamp, 1988. "Culture and Region: A Multidimensional Evaluation of Monuments," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 15(1), pages 5-14, March.
    3. Anastasia STRATIGEA & Elias GRAMMATIKOGIANNIS, 2012. "A Multicriteria Decision Support Framework For Assessing Alternative Wind Park Locations: The Case Of Tanagra - Boiotia," Regional Science Inquiry, Hellenic Association of Regional Scientists, vol. 0(1), pages 105-120, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:5:y:2013:i:9:p:3992-4023:d:28979. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.