IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v2y2010i12p3695-3709d10375.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Crop Sequence Influences on Sustainable Spring Wheat Production in the Northern Great Plains

Author

Listed:
  • Donald L. Tanaka

    () (Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA-ARS), P.O. Box 459, Mandan, ND 58554, USA)

  • Mark A. Liebig

    () (Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA-ARS), P.O. Box 459, Mandan, ND 58554, USA)

  • Joseph M. Krupinsky

    () (Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA-ARS), P.O. Box 459, Mandan, ND 58554, USA)

  • Stephen D. Merrill

    () (Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA-ARS), P.O. Box 459, Mandan, ND 58554, USA)

Abstract

Cropping systems in American agriculture are highly successful since World War II, but have become highly specialized, standardized, and simplified to meet the demands of an industrialized food system. Minimal attention has been given to the efficient exploitation of crop diversity and the synergistic and/or antagonistic relationships of crops in crop sequences. Objectives of our research were to determine if previous crop sequences have long-term benefits and/or drawbacks on spring wheat seed yield, seed N concentration, and seed precipitation-use efficiency in the semiarid northern Great Plains, USA. Research was conducted 6 km southwest of Mandan, ND using a 10 × 10 crop matrix technique as a research tool to evaluate multiple crop sequence effects on spring wheat ( triticum aestivum L.) production in 2004 and 2005. Spring wheat production risks can be mitigated when second year crop residue was dry pea ( Pisium sativum L.) averaged over all first year crop residues. When compared to spring wheat as second year crop residue in the dry year of 2004, dry pea as the second year residue crop resulted in a 30% spring wheat seed yield increase. Sustainable cropping systems need to use precipitation efficiently for crop production, especially during below average precipitation years like 2004. Precipitation use efficiency average over all treatments, during the below average precipitation year was 23% greater than the above average precipitation year of 2005. Diversifying crops in cropping systems improves production efficiencies and resilience of agricultural systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Donald L. Tanaka & Mark A. Liebig & Joseph M. Krupinsky & Stephen D. Merrill, 2010. "Crop Sequence Influences on Sustainable Spring Wheat Production in the Northern Great Plains," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 2(12), pages 1-15, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:2:y:2010:i:12:p:3695-3709:d:10375
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/2/12/3695/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/2/12/3695/
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    cropping systems; no-till; crop rotation; dryland agriculture;

    JEL classification:

    • Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics
    • Q0 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General
    • Q2 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation
    • Q3 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation
    • Q5 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth
    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:2:y:2010:i:12:p:3695-3709:d:10375. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (XML Conversion Team). General contact details of provider: http://www.mdpi.com/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.