IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i9p4128-d1648461.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Cellulose Nanofibril from Sugarcane Bagasse as an Eco-Friendly Ductile Reinforcement in Starch Films for Packaging

Author

Listed:
  • Thayrine Silva Matos Ribeiro

    (Department of Forest Science, Federal University of Lavras—UFLA, Lavras 37200-000, Brazil)

  • Caio Cesar Nemer Martins

    (Department of Forest Science, Federal University of Viçosa—UFV, Viçosa 36570-081, Brazil)

  • Mário Vanoli Scatolino

    (Department of Forest Science, State University of Amapá—UEAP, Macapá 68900-030, Brazil)

  • Matheus Cordazzo Dias

    (Department of Forest Science, State University of Amapá—UEAP, Macapá 68900-030, Brazil)

  • Adriano Reis Prazeres Mascarenhas

    (Department of Forest Engineering, Federal University of Rondônia—UNIR, Rolim de Moura 76940-000, Brazil)

  • Cecilia Baldoino Ferreira

    (Chemistry Department, Federal University of Lavras—UFLA, Lavras 37200-000, Brazil)

  • Maria Lucia Bianchi

    (Chemistry Department, Federal University of Lavras—UFLA, Lavras 37200-000, Brazil)

  • Gustavo Henrique Denzin Tonoli

    (Department of Forest Science, Federal University of Lavras—UFLA, Lavras 37200-000, Brazil)

Abstract

Attempts have been made to replace conventional plastics in food packaging with biodegradable materials as a promising alternative because they are natural, renewable, and low-cost. This study aimed to develop biodegradable and resistant films from cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs) from sugarcane bagasse when used as reinforcement in starch films. Sugarcane bagasse pulps were subjected to alkaline treatment, with the residual lignin remaining. Part of the material was subjected to a bleaching process with H 2 O 2 . The pulps were subjected to the mechanical fibrillation process, and unbleached and bleached CNFs were produced. Percentages of 10%, 20%, 30%, and 50% CNF were added to a solution containing 2.5% starch ( m / m ) solids to make the films. The addition of unbleached CNF promoted an average increase in the tensile strength and Young’s modulus values, especially for films with higher percentages of CNF (30% and 50%). The contact angle values increased with the CNF concentration, with all films being classified as hydrophobic (>90°), except for the films with 30% and 50% unbleached CNF. The 50% unbleached and bleached CNF samples showed low water vapor permeability (2.17 g.mm/Kpa −1 day −1 m 2 ), indicating a good vapor barrier. Although the influence of residual lignin on the test results was not identified for the other samples, treatments with 50% CNF of sugarcane bagasse (unbleached or bleached) should be highlighted among the properties evaluated for reinforcing the structure and improving the barrier properties of cassava starch-based films. Furthermore, this study proposes using sugarcane bagasse, which is a waste widely available in Brazil, placing the study in line with three Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Suggested Citation

  • Thayrine Silva Matos Ribeiro & Caio Cesar Nemer Martins & Mário Vanoli Scatolino & Matheus Cordazzo Dias & Adriano Reis Prazeres Mascarenhas & Cecilia Baldoino Ferreira & Maria Lucia Bianchi & Gustavo, 2025. "Using Cellulose Nanofibril from Sugarcane Bagasse as an Eco-Friendly Ductile Reinforcement in Starch Films for Packaging," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-17, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:4128-:d:1648461
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/4128/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/4128/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kirchherr, Julian & Reike, Denise & Hekkert, Marko, 2017. "Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 221-232.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pina Puntillo, 2023. "Circular economy business models: Towards achieving sustainable development goals in the waste management sector—Empirical evidence and theoretical implications," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 941-954, March.
    2. Tina Wiegand & Martin Wynn, 2023. "Sustainability, the Circular Economy and Digitalisation in the German Textile and Clothing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-30, June.
    3. German Arana‐Landin & Waleska Sigüenza & Beñat Landeta‐Manzano & Iker Laskurain‐Iturbe, 2024. "Circular economy: On the road to ISO 59000 family of standards," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 1977-2009, May.
    4. Abdulmajeed Almadhi & Abdelhakim Abdelhadi & Rakan Alyamani, 2023. "Moving from Linear to Circular Economy in Saudi Arabia: Life-Cycle Assessment on Plastic Waste Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, July.
    5. Hu, Xueyue & Wang, Chunying & Elshkaki, Ayman, 2024. "Material-energy Nexus: A systematic literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    6. Sergio Cappucci & Serena Nappi & Andrea Cappelli, 2022. "Green Public Areas and Urban Open Spaces Management: New GreenCAL Tool Algorithms and Circular Economy Implications," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-25, June.
    7. Monia Niero & Charlotte L. Jensen & Chiara Farné Fratini & Jens Dorland & Michael S. Jørgensen & Susse Georg, 2021. "Is life cycle assessment enough to address unintended side effects from Circular Economy initiatives?," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(5), pages 1111-1120, October.
    8. Flavio Eduardo Fava & Lucílio Rogério Aparecido Alves & Thiago Libório Romanelli, 2025. "Economic Feasibility and Decarbonization Incentives of Sugarcane Biogas Production Pathways," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, February.
    9. Thomas Dobbelstein & Carina Lochner, 2023. "Factors influencing purchase intention for recycled products: A comparative analysis of Germany and South Africa," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(4), pages 2256-2277, August.
    10. Jaroslaw Golebiewski & Josu Takala & Oskar Juszczyk & Nina Drejerska, 2019. "Local contribution to circular economy. A case study of a Polish rural municipality," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 21(3), pages 771-791.
    11. Risa Arai & Martin Calisto Friant & Walter J. V. Vermeulen, 2024. "The Japanese Circular Economy and Sound Material-Cycle Society Policies: Discourse and Policy Analysis," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 619-650, March.
    12. Franco Fassio & Chiara Chirilli, 2023. "The Circular Economy and the Food System: A Review of Principal Measuring Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, June.
    13. S. Bhattacharya & R. Ajwani-Ramchandani & Shishir Kumar Jha & C.J. Chiappetta Jabbour & V.G. Venkatesh, 2023. "Prologue for the Virtual Special Issue on Social Circular Consumption- Exploring the Role of the Bottom of Pyramid," Post-Print hal-04458204, HAL.
    14. Eugenia Rossi di Schio & Vincenzo Ballerini & Jan Kašpar & Manuela Neri & Mariagrazia Pilotelli & Edoardo Alessio Piana & Paolo Valdiserri, 2024. "Applicability of Face Masks as Recyclable Raw Materials for Self-Made Insulation Panels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-15, March.
    15. Mădălina Tocan & Oana Chindriș-Văsioiu, 2024. "Circular And Green Economy – A Comparative Analysis Of The Current State In Romania And In The Eu," Global Economic Observer, "Nicolae Titulescu" University of Bucharest, Faculty of Economic Sciences;Institute for World Economy of the Romanian Academy, vol. 12(1), pages 95-105, June.
    16. Dumitru Alexandru Bodislav & Liviu Cătălin Moraru & Raluca Iuliana Georgescu & George Eduard Grigore & Oana Vlăduț & Gabriel Ilie Staicu & Alina Ștefania Chenic, 2025. "Recyclable Consumption and Its Implications for Sustainable Development in the EU," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-36, April.
    17. Pedro Antonio Martín-Cervantes & Parisa Ziarati & Pablo de Frutos Madrazo & Iza Gigauri, 2025. "Digital Marketing as a Driver of Change Towards the Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-24, June.
    18. Mia B. Münster, 2024. "Adaptive Reuse: Atmospherics in Buildings Repurposed as Coffee Shops," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-32, February.
    19. D. D’Amato, 2021. "Sustainability Narratives as Transformative Solution Pathways: Zooming in on the Circular Economy," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 231-242, June.
    20. Florian Fizaine, 2021. "La croissance verte est-elle durable et compatible avec l’économie circulaire ? Une approche par l’identité IPAT," Post-Print hal-03884377, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:4128-:d:1648461. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.