IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i9p4020-d1645904.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Governance Audit Mechanisms on Environmental Sustainability and Emissions in Saudi Arabia Under ESG Regulations

Author

Listed:
  • Abdulwahid Ahmed Hashed

    (Department of Accounting, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia)

  • Faozi A. Almaqtari

    (Department of Accounting and Finance, College of Business Administration, A’Sharqiyah University (ASU), Ibra 400, Oman)

  • Ahmed Elmashtawy

    (Faculty of Commerce, Menoufia University, Menoufia 32511, Egypt)

  • Nahla Abdulrahman Mohammed Raweh

    (Department of Accounting, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of corporate governance factors and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) regulations on environmental performance and emissions in Saudi Arabian companies to explore whether these companies are in line with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Using a pooled panel data approach for 51 Saudi-listed firms over the period from 2016 to 2023, the study examines the role of various governance mechanisms, such as audit committees, internal audits, audit quality, and leverage, in influencing companies’ environmental outcomes. The results indicate that ESG regulations have a promotive and statistically significant impact on reducing environmental emissions and improving environmental performance, particularly when supported by robust governance audit mechanisms. The results show that audit committee expertise, internal auditing, and audit tenure after ESG regulations exhibit a positive and significant effect on reducing environmental emissions and improving environmental performance. The findings have important policy, managerial, and theoretical implications, emphasizing the role of government regulations in shaping corporate sustainability practices, the need for improved corporate governance, and the theoretical link between governance and environmental performance. The study bridges an existing gap in the context of the impact of ESG regulations in emerging economies. The study contributes to the growing body of knowledge on ESG practices in emerging markets, particularly in the context of Saudi Arabia’s regulatory landscape.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdulwahid Ahmed Hashed & Faozi A. Almaqtari & Ahmed Elmashtawy & Nahla Abdulrahman Mohammed Raweh, 2025. "The Role of Governance Audit Mechanisms on Environmental Sustainability and Emissions in Saudi Arabia Under ESG Regulations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-22, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:4020-:d:1645904
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/4020/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/4020/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dana Simona Gherai & Diana Claudia Sabău Popa & Luminița Rus & Diana Elisabeta Matica & Codruța Mare, 2024. "The Impact of Romanian Internal Auditors in ESG Reporting and Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Dominic S.B. Soh & Nonna Martinov-Bennie, 2015. "Internal auditors’ perceptions of their role in environmental, social and governance assurance and consulting," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(1), pages 80-111, January.
    3. Oren Mooneeapen & Subhash Abhayawansa & Naushad Mamode Khan, 2022. "The influence of the country governance environment on corporate environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(4), pages 953-985, May.
    4. Luk Luk Fuadah & Mukhtaruddin Mukhtaruddin & Isni Andriana & Anton Arisman, 2022. "The Ownership Structure, and the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Disclosure, Firm Value and Firm Performance: The Audit Committee as Moderating Variable," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    5. repec:eme:maj000:maj-08-2014-1075 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Muhammad Bilawal Khaskheli & Yongchen Zhao, 2025. "The Sustainability of Economic and Business Practices Through Legal Cooperation in the Era of the Hainan Free Trade Port and Southeast Asian Nations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-26, February.
    7. Oren Mooneeapen & Subhash Abhayawansa & Naushad Mamode Khan, 2022. "The influence of the country governance environment on corporate environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(4), pages 953-985, May.
    8. Ja Eun Koo & Eun Sun Ki, 2020. "Internal Control Personnel’s Experience, Internal Control Weaknesses, and ESG Rating," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-16, October.
    9. Jennifer Syme & Henry An & Mohammad Torshizi, 2024. "Estimating the effect of time‐invariant characteristics in panel data: wheat adoption in Western Canada," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 106(2), pages 828-851, March.
    10. Alena Kocmanová & Marie Pavláková Dočekalová & Stanislav Škapa & Lenka Širáňová, 2016. "Measuring Corporate Sustainability and Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance Value Added," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1, September.
    11. Meiying Hua & Pervaiz Alam, 2021. "Audit Quality and Environment, Social, and Governance Risks," International Journal of Business Research and Management (IJBRM), Computer Science Journals (CSC Journals), vol. 12(2), pages 50-75, April.
    12. Abdallah A. S. Fayad & Saleh F. A. Khatib & Abdulrahman Alomair & Abdulaziz S. Al Naim, 2024. "Audit Chair Characteristics and ESG Disclosure: Evidence from the Saudi Stock Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-15, December.
    13. Dominic S.B. Soh & Nonna Martinov-Bennie, 2015. "Internal auditors’ perceptions of their role in environmental, social and governance assurance and consulting," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 30(1), pages 80-111, January.
    14. Mohamed Chakib Kolsi & Ahmad Al-Hiyari, 2024. "Does internal audit function outsourcing policy matter for environmental, social and governance performance score? Evidence from Bursa Malaysia," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(6), pages 1442-1459, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Changlin Ji & Yuwei Feng, 2025. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Evaluating the Innovation-Boosting Potential of Low-Carbon Pilot Policies: A Multi-Subject Co-Governance Perspective," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(2), pages 6033-6072, June.
    2. Shi, Dinghao & Tan, Haoyu & Ling, Yixin & Liu, Yunuo & Liu, Bo & Tu, Yongqian, 2025. "Impact of environmental information uncertainty and market competition on corporate ESG performance," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    3. Mohapatra, Swati & Kumar, Ashish & Mohapatra, Malaya Ranjan & Srivastava, Vikas, 2025. "Does CEO duality moderate environmental, social, and governance performance-earnings management relationship? Evidence from emerging markets," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    4. Haoming Ding & Zerui Wang, 2025. "The Influence of Institutional Pressures on Environmental, Social, and Governance Responsibility Fulfillment: Insights from Chinese Listed Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-13, April.
    5. Ayadi, Imen & Abderrahman, Jahmane, 2025. "The impact of economic policy uncertainty and digital integration on ESG practices in European companies," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    6. Feng, Ruonan & Ma, Lu & Wu, Dan, 2025. "ESG performance and corporate innovation under the moderating effect of firm size," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    7. Mo Zhou & Kaihua Bao & Xiliang Hu & Chen Gao & Ya Wen & Ting Zhang, 2025. "Climate-Resilient City Construction and Firms’ ESG Performance: Mechanism Analysis and Empirical Tests," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-22, July.
    8. Xue, Qinyuan & Jin, Yifei & Zhang, Cheng, 2024. "ESG rating results and corporate total factor productivity," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PA).
    9. Song, Yinghao & Bian, Zhaian & Tu, Wei & He, Juan, 2025. "How environmental regulation policies affect corporate ESG ratings: Latecomer advantage in China's digital economy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    10. Davies Wambwa & Jhonnah Mundike & Brian Chirambo, 2025. "Balancing economic development, social responsibility, and environmental conservation through financial assurance programs in sub-Saharan Africa’s mining industry," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 5869-5892, March.
    11. Jiyoung Park & Jiyoon Lee & Jessika Holtta, 2025. "State-level political environments and executive compensation in the United States: evidence on pay inequality," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 439-467, September.
    12. Mahdi Ghaemi Asl, 2025. "A novel AI-driven approach to greenwashing: breakthroughs in the future fit between domain-specific Islamic enterprises with varying developmental progress and ESG landscapes," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-38, December.
    13. Esparcia, Carlos & Gubareva, Mariya & Sokolova, Tatiana & Jareño, Francisco, 2025. "Cross-border ESG rating dynamics: An in-depth connectedness analysis of portfolio returns and volatilities in the USA and Canada," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 75(PA).
    14. Li, Junjun & Wu, Tong & Hu, Boqiang & Pan, Dongliang & Zhou, Yaqiong, 2025. "Artificial intelligence and corporate ESG performance," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    15. Malik, Mahfuja & Mamun, Khawaja & Osman, Syed Muhammad Ishraque, 2025. "Does corruption control enhance ESG-induced firm value? Insights from machine learning analysis," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    16. Sang-Uk Jung, 2025. "Tracing the Diffusion of Sustainability Discourse: Institutional Signals and Consumer Search Behavior in the United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-14, August.
    17. Liu Xia & Nazneen Fatema & Md. Mominur Rahman & Arman Hossain, 2025. "Nexus of environmental management accounting, and carbon emission management on environmental, social, and governance performance: evidence from symmetrical and asymmetrical approach," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    18. Eduard Madalin Dinu & Cecilia Nicoleta Jurcut & Delia Anca Gabriela Gligor & Irina Daniela Cismasu & Alexandru Buglea, 2025. "Integrating Digital Technologies to Enhance ESG Performance: A Focus on Central and Eastern European Countries," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 27(70), pages 903-903, August.
    19. Bock, Lennart & Thun, Toni W. & Zülch, Henning, 2025. "Do good and talk about it: The impact of investor relations quality on ESG ratings," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    20. Yushen Du & Hongli Bao & Fan Zhang, 2025. "Strategizing Enterprise Dominance in Standards Associations: The Power of Relational Capital and Market Dynamics," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 501-532, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:4020-:d:1645904. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.