IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i9p4020-d1645904.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Governance Audit Mechanisms on Environmental Sustainability and Emissions in Saudi Arabia Under ESG Regulations

Author

Listed:
  • Abdulwahid Ahmed Hashed

    (Department of Accounting, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia)

  • Faozi A. Almaqtari

    (Department of Accounting and Finance, College of Business Administration, A’Sharqiyah University (ASU), Ibra 400, Oman)

  • Ahmed Elmashtawy

    (Faculty of Commerce, Menoufia University, Menoufia 32511, Egypt)

  • Nahla Abdulrahman Mohammed Raweh

    (Department of Accounting, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of corporate governance factors and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) regulations on environmental performance and emissions in Saudi Arabian companies to explore whether these companies are in line with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Using a pooled panel data approach for 51 Saudi-listed firms over the period from 2016 to 2023, the study examines the role of various governance mechanisms, such as audit committees, internal audits, audit quality, and leverage, in influencing companies’ environmental outcomes. The results indicate that ESG regulations have a promotive and statistically significant impact on reducing environmental emissions and improving environmental performance, particularly when supported by robust governance audit mechanisms. The results show that audit committee expertise, internal auditing, and audit tenure after ESG regulations exhibit a positive and significant effect on reducing environmental emissions and improving environmental performance. The findings have important policy, managerial, and theoretical implications, emphasizing the role of government regulations in shaping corporate sustainability practices, the need for improved corporate governance, and the theoretical link between governance and environmental performance. The study bridges an existing gap in the context of the impact of ESG regulations in emerging economies. The study contributes to the growing body of knowledge on ESG practices in emerging markets, particularly in the context of Saudi Arabia’s regulatory landscape.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdulwahid Ahmed Hashed & Faozi A. Almaqtari & Ahmed Elmashtawy & Nahla Abdulrahman Mohammed Raweh, 2025. "The Role of Governance Audit Mechanisms on Environmental Sustainability and Emissions in Saudi Arabia Under ESG Regulations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-22, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:4020-:d:1645904
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/4020/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/4020/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dana Simona Gherai & Diana Claudia Sabău Popa & Luminița Rus & Diana Elisabeta Matica & Codruța Mare, 2024. "The Impact of Romanian Internal Auditors in ESG Reporting and Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Jennifer Syme & Henry An & Mohammad Torshizi, 2024. "Estimating the effect of time‐invariant characteristics in panel data: wheat adoption in Western Canada," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 106(2), pages 828-851, March.
    3. Alena Kocmanová & Marie Pavláková Dočekalová & Stanislav Škapa & Lenka Širáňová, 2016. "Measuring Corporate Sustainability and Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance Value Added," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1, September.
    4. Meiying Hua & Pervaiz Alam, 2021. "Audit Quality and Environment, Social, and Governance Risks," International Journal of Business Research and Management (IJBRM), Computer Science Journals (CSC Journals), vol. 12(2), pages 50-75, April.
    5. Luk Luk Fuadah & Mukhtaruddin Mukhtaruddin & Isni Andriana & Anton Arisman, 2022. "The Ownership Structure, and the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Disclosure, Firm Value and Firm Performance: The Audit Committee as Moderating Variable," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Oren Mooneeapen & Subhash Abhayawansa & Naushad Mamode Khan, 2022. "The influence of the country governance environment on corporate environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(4), pages 953-985, May.
    7. repec:eme:maj000:maj-08-2014-1075 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Abdallah A. S. Fayad & Saleh F. A. Khatib & Abdulrahman Alomair & Abdulaziz S. Al Naim, 2024. "Audit Chair Characteristics and ESG Disclosure: Evidence from the Saudi Stock Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Ja Eun Koo & Eun Sun Ki, 2020. "Internal Control Personnel’s Experience, Internal Control Weaknesses, and ESG Rating," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-16, October.
    10. Dominic S.B. Soh & Nonna Martinov-Bennie, 2015. "Internal auditors’ perceptions of their role in environmental, social and governance assurance and consulting," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(1), pages 80-111, January.
    11. Dominic S.B. Soh & Nonna Martinov-Bennie, 2015. "Internal auditors’ perceptions of their role in environmental, social and governance assurance and consulting," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 30(1), pages 80-111, January.
    12. Mohamed Chakib Kolsi & Ahmad Al-Hiyari, 2024. "Does internal audit function outsourcing policy matter for environmental, social and governance performance score? Evidence from Bursa Malaysia," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(6), pages 1442-1459, May.
    13. Oren Mooneeapen & Subhash Abhayawansa & Naushad Mamode Khan, 2022. "The influence of the country governance environment on corporate environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(4), pages 953-985, May.
    14. Muhammad Bilawal Khaskheli & Yongchen Zhao, 2025. "The Sustainability of Economic and Business Practices Through Legal Cooperation in the Era of the Hainan Free Trade Port and Southeast Asian Nations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-26, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Esparcia, Carlos & Gubareva, Mariya & Sokolova, Tatiana & Jareño, Francisco, 2025. "Cross-border ESG rating dynamics: An in-depth connectedness analysis of portfolio returns and volatilities in the USA and Canada," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 75(PA).
    2. Haoming Ding & Zerui Wang, 2025. "The Influence of Institutional Pressures on Environmental, Social, and Governance Responsibility Fulfillment: Insights from Chinese Listed Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-13, April.
    3. Feng, Ruonan & Ma, Lu & Wu, Dan, 2025. "ESG performance and corporate innovation under the moderating effect of firm size," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    4. Xue, Qinyuan & Jin, Yifei & Zhang, Cheng, 2024. "ESG rating results and corporate total factor productivity," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PA).
    5. Malik, Mahfuja & Mamun, Khawaja & Osman, Syed Muhammad Ishraque, 2025. "Does corruption control enhance ESG-induced firm value? Insights from machine learning analysis," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    6. Davies Wambwa & Jhonnah Mundike & Brian Chirambo, 2025. "Balancing economic development, social responsibility, and environmental conservation through financial assurance programs in sub-Saharan Africa’s mining industry," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 5869-5892, March.
    7. Yushen Du & Hongli Bao & Fan Zhang, 2025. "Strategizing Enterprise Dominance in Standards Associations: The Power of Relational Capital and Market Dynamics," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 501-532, March.
    8. Mustafa Yucel & Guler Yanik & Faruk Dayi & Ayhan Benek, 2025. "Strategic Management of Environmental, Social, and Governance Scores and Corporate Governance Index: A Panel Data Analysis of Firm Value on the Istanbul Stock Exchange," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-24, May.
    9. Mahdi Ghaemi Asl, 2025. "A novel AI-driven approach to greenwashing: breakthroughs in the future fit between domain-specific Islamic enterprises with varying developmental progress and ESG landscapes," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-38, December.
    10. Xueying Yuan & Lixia Shang & Jinhua Xu, 2024. "Green Financial Policy, Resource Allocation and Corporate Environmental Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-29, July.
    11. Maria-Teresa Bosch-Badia & Joan Montllor-Serrats & Maria-Antonia Tarrazon-Rodon, 2017. "Efficiency and Sustainability of CSR Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-18, September.
    12. Alena Kocmanová & Marie Pavláková Dočekalová & Tomáš Meluzín & Stanislav Škapa, 2020. "Sustainable Investing Model for Decision Makers (Based On Research of Manufacturing Industry in the Czech Republic)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-27, October.
    13. Richard Yeaw Chong Seow, 2024. "Determinants of environmental, social, and governance disclosure: A systematic literature review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 2314-2330, March.
    14. Massimo Arnone & Carlo Drago & Alberto Costantiello & Angelo Leogrande, 2025. "Political Trust in Italy: How Environmental, Social, and Governance Factors Shape Confidence in Parties," Working Papers hal-04920996, HAL.
    15. Shaista Wasiuzzaman & Vasanthan Subramaniam, 2023. "Board gender diversity and environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure: Is it different for developed and developing nations?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 2145-2165, September.
    16. Patrick Velte & Martin Stawinoga, 2017. "Empirical research on corporate social responsibility assurance (CSRA): A literature review," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(8), pages 1017-1066, November.
    17. Rasmi Meqbel & Mohammad Alta'any & Salah Kayed & Ahmed Al‐Omush, 2024. "Earnings management and sustainability assurance: The moderating role of CSR committee," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 1769-1785, May.
    18. Jian Yin & Jian Xu, 2025. "Exploring the Impact of Board Size on ESG Controversies: New Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-22, May.
    19. Akrum Helfaya & Nadeesha Muthuthantrige & Shirley Xu, 2024. "Greening the Workplace: Exploring the Influence of Corporate Sustainability Governance on Corporate Labour Rights in the Case of Indian Listed Companies for the Period of 2010 to 2021," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-27, May.
    20. Miriam Jankalová & Jana Kurotová, 2019. "Sustainability Assessment Using Economic Value Added," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:4020-:d:1645904. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.