IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p7697-d1733301.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tracing the Diffusion of Sustainability Discourse: Institutional Signals and Consumer Search Behavior in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Sang-Uk Jung

    (Business School, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Dongdamun-gu, Imunro 107, Seoul 02450, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

In the digital era, online search patterns provide a practical way to track changes in the public interest in sustainability. This study analyzes monthly Google Trends data in the United States (January 2019–December 2024) for five keywords: two institutional (“ESG”, “carbon neutral”), and three consumer-oriented (“eco friendly”, “zero waste”, and “plastic free”). Drawing on agenda-setting theory and the diffusion-of-innovations framework, we test the directional links between institutional and consumer attention. The methods include Granger causality tests, impulse response functions, and cross-correlation analysis. The findings reveal a consistent lead–lag structure in which institutional terms precede consumer-oriented searches, but the timing and persistence of influence vary across concepts. A broad discourse such as ESG produces slower, yet more sustained, effects, whereas action-oriented concepts like carbon neutrality generate quicker but shorter-lived responses. Seasonal analysis also shows recurring peaks in consumer interest around events such as Earth Day and Plastic-Free July, underscoring the cyclical nature of attention to sustainability. By integrating communication theory with multi-year digital trace data, this study provides evidence of how institutional messaging diffuses into consumer behavior, while highlighting the roles of timing and message framing. The results contribute to sustainability communication research and offer practical insights for policymakers, NGOs, and marketers relevant to aligning campaigns with evolving public attention.

Suggested Citation

  • Sang-Uk Jung, 2025. "Tracing the Diffusion of Sustainability Discourse: Institutional Signals and Consumer Search Behavior in the United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-14, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7697-:d:1733301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7697/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7697/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7697-:d:1733301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.