IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i9p3973-d1644756.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Practical and Sustainable Approach to Industrial Engineering Discrete-Event Simulation with Free Mathematical and Programming Software

Author

Listed:
  • Jérémie Schutz

    (LGIPM, Université de Lorraine, F-57000 Metz, France
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Christophe Sauvey

    (LGIPM, Université de Lorraine, F-57000 Metz, France
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Eduard Laurențiu Nițu

    (Manufacturing and Industrial Management Department, Piteşti University Center, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Ana Cornelia Gavriluță

    (Manufacturing and Industrial Management Department, Piteşti University Center, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

Discrete-event simulation (DES) is a powerful tool for modeling and analyzing complex systems where state changes occur at discrete points in time. This paper presents a practical and sustainable approach to implementing DES using free mathematical and programming software, making it accessible to a wider audience including educators, students, and practitioners. This study explores the use of open-source tools, such as Python and Octave, highlighting their capabilities in building and optimizing DES models without the need for expensive and unaffordable software. In the context of Industry 4.0 and smart manufacturing, the ability to simulate and optimize discrete processes with open tools contributes to the development of digital twins, the integration of cyberphysical systems, and data-driven decision-making. Through detailed case studies in industrial fields, including manufacturing, maintenance, and logistics, this study demonstrates the effectiveness of these tools in simulating real processes and promoting their sustainability. Case studies are also re-examined to emphasize their relevance to smart manufacturing, particularly in terms of predictive maintenance, process optimization, and operational flexibility. Several challenges were encountered during the research process, such as adapting DES methodologies to the limitations of general-purpose mathematical software, ensuring accurate time management and event scheduling in environments not specifically designed for simulation, and balancing model complexity with accessibility for nonexpert users. The integration of free software not only reduces costs but also promotes collaborative learning and innovation. Additionally, the paper discusses the best practices for model validation and experimentation, providing a comprehensive guide for those new to DES. By linking open-source DES tools to the objectives of Industry 4.0, we aim to reinforce the applicability of our approach to modern, connected industrial environments. By leveraging free mathematical and programming software, this approach aims to democratize the use of DES, fostering a deeper understanding and broader application of simulation techniques across diverse fields and various regions of the world.

Suggested Citation

  • Jérémie Schutz & Christophe Sauvey & Eduard Laurențiu Nițu & Ana Cornelia Gavriluță, 2025. "A Practical and Sustainable Approach to Industrial Engineering Discrete-Event Simulation with Free Mathematical and Programming Software," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-55, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3973-:d:1644756
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/3973/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/3973/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robinson, Stewart, 2002. "General concepts of quality for discrete-event simulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(1), pages 103-117, April.
    2. Carmen María Yago & Francisco Javier Díez, 2023. "DESnets: A Graphical Representation for Discrete Event Simulation and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-24, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. O'Keefe, Robert M., 2016. "Experimental behavioural research in operational research: What we know and what we might come to know," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(3), pages 899-907.
    2. Ortiz-Barrios, Miguel & Arias-Fonseca, Sebastián & Ishizaka, Alessio & Barbati, Maria & Avendaño-Collante, Betty & Navarro-Jiménez, Eduardo, 2023. "Artificial intelligence and discrete-event simulation for capacity management of intensive care units during the Covid-19 pandemic: A case study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    3. Lami, Isabella M. & Tavella, Elena, 2019. "On the usefulness of soft OR models in decision making: A comparison of Problem Structuring Methods supported and self-organized workshops," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(3), pages 1020-1036.
    4. Janová, Jitka & Hampel, David & Nerudová, Danuše, 2019. "Design and validation of a tax sustainability index," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(3), pages 916-926.
    5. S Robinson, 2008. "Conceptual modelling for simulation Part II: a framework for conceptual modelling," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(3), pages 291-304, March.
    6. Bornmann, Lutz & Ganser, Christian & Tekles, Alexander, 2022. "Simulation of the h index use at university departments within the bibliometrics-based heuristics framework: Can the indicator be used to compare individual researchers?," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1).
    7. Keshtkaran, Mahsa & Churilov, Leonid & Hearne, John & Abbasi, Babak & Meretoja, Atte, 2016. "Validation of a decision support model for investigation and improvement in stroke thrombolysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(1), pages 154-169.
    8. Mohsen Jahangirian & Simon J E Taylor & Terry Young & Stewart Robinson, 2017. "Key performance indicators for successful simulation projects," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(7), pages 747-765, July.
    9. Pessôa, Leonardo Antonio Monteiro & Lins, Marcos Pereira Estellita & da Silva, Angela Cristina Moreira & Fiszman, Roberto, 2015. "Integrating soft and hard operational research to improve surgical centre management at a university hospital," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(3), pages 851-861.
    10. Nicolas Bahou & Claire Fenwick & Gillian Anderson & Robert Meer & Tony Vassalos, 2018. "Modeling the critical care pathway for cardiothoracic surgery," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 192-203, June.
    11. Harper, Alison & Mustafee, Navonil & Yearworth, Mike, 2021. "Facets of trust in simulation studies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(1), pages 197-213.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3973-:d:1644756. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.