IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i8p3601-d1636065.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Industry 4.0 and Management 4.0: Examining the Impact of Environmental, Cultural, and Technological Changes

Author

Listed:
  • Aylin Yılmaz Gezgin

    (Vocational School of Social Sciences, Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Univesity, Karaman 70100, Türkiye)

  • Mustafa Atilla Arıcıoğlu

    (Faculty of Political Science, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya 42090, Türkiye)

Abstract

Environmental, cultural, and technological developments, along with Industry 4.0 technologies—one of the most significant topics of recent years—have led to a paradigm shift in management functions and practices. These changes raise questions about the necessity of discussing the emergence of a new revolution in management, referred to as Management 4.0. Accordingly, the purpose of this exploratory sequential mixed-methods study is to examine the impact of environmental, cultural, and technological developments on management functions through Industry 4.0 technologies and to explore the underlying elements of the qualitative findings in depth. To address the research problem, 401 business managers participated in the quantitative phase of the study, while 10 business managers took part in the qualitative phase. The quantitative phase also included scale development. The study discusses the prediction of Management 4.0 and evaluates its feasibility. The findings from the quantitative research indicate that Industry 4.0 technologies play a mediating role between environmental changes and management functions. Meanwhile, the qualitative findings suggest that environmental, cultural, and technological developments are shaping a new cultural environment, necessitating adaptation to a new order. As a result of these changes, employees are expected to take part in decision-making processes. In terms of management functions, key developments include enhanced planning and coordination, the rise of platform-based business models, increased collaboration with competitors, the adoption of a modern management approach, and more frequent monitoring and control. Furthermore, the study reveals that although business managers in Turkey recognize the necessity of adopting Industry 4.0 technologies, their widespread implementation remains limited. This study contributes to the literature by introducing the concept of Management 4.0 and developing the Management 4.0 Foresight Scale.

Suggested Citation

  • Aylin Yılmaz Gezgin & Mustafa Atilla Arıcıoğlu, 2025. "Industry 4.0 and Management 4.0: Examining the Impact of Environmental, Cultural, and Technological Changes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-42, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3601-:d:1636065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3601/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3601/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:aud:audfin:v:20:y:2018:i:49:p:805 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Tine Bertoncel & Ivan Erenda & Maja Meško, 2018. "Best Practices. Managerial Early Warning System as Best Practice for Project Selection at a Smart Factory," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 20(49), pages 805-805, August.
    3. Dalenogare, Lucas Santos & Benitez, Guilherme Brittes & Ayala, Néstor Fabián & Frank, Alejandro Germán, 2018. "The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 383-394.
    4. Yurii Hrinchenko, 2021. "Implications of the “Industry 4.0” Concept on Management Practice," Journal of Applied Management and Investments, Department of Business Administration and Corporate Security, International Humanitarian University, vol. 10(1), pages 31-41, April.
    5. Raihan Maskuriy & Ali Selamat & Petra Maresova & Ondrej Krejcar & Oladipo Olalekan David, 2019. "Industry 4.0 for the Construction Industry: Review of Management Perspective," Economies, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-14, July.
    6. Werner, Manuel, 1992. "The great paradox: Responsibility without empowerment," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 55-58.
    7. Małgorzata Dobrowolska & Lilla Knop, 2020. "Fit to Work in the Business Models of the Industry 4.0 Age," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-18, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marzena Podgórska, 2022. "Challenges and Perspectives in Innovative Projects Focused on Sustainable Industry 4.0—A Case Study on Polish Project Teams," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Sebastian Saniuk & Sandra Grabowska & Wieslaw Grebski, 2022. "Knowledge and Skills Development in the Context of the Fourth Industrial Revolution Technologies: Interviews of Experts from Pennsylvania State of the USA," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Muhammad Altaf & Wesam Salah Alaloul & Muhammad Ali Musarat & Abdul Hannan Qureshi, 2023. "Life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) of construction projects: sustainability perspective," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(11), pages 12071-12118, November.
    4. Gilberto Santos & Jose Carlos Sá & Maria João Félix & Luís Barreto & Filipe Carvalho & Manuel Doiro & Kristína Zgodavová & Miladin Stefanović, 2021. "New Needed Quality Management Skills for Quality Managers 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, May.
    5. Verônica Maurer Tabim & Néstor Fabián Ayala & Alejandro G. Frank, 2024. "Implementing Vertical Integration in the Industry 4.0 Journey: Which Factors Influence the Process of Information Systems Adoption?," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 1615-1632, October.
    6. Ed Burton & David John Edwards & Chris Roberts & Nicholas Chileshe & Joseph H. K. Lai, 2021. "Delineating the Implications of Dispersing Teams and Teleworking in an Agile UK Construction Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-21, September.
    7. Michal Gluszak & Remigiusz Gawlik & Malgorzata Zieba, 2019. "Smart and Green Buildings Features in the Decision-Making Hierarchy of Office Space Tenants: An Analytic Hierarchy Process Study," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-16, July.
    8. Paweł Poszytek, 2021. "The Landscape of Scientific Discussions on the Competencies 4.0 Concept in the Context of the 4th Industrial Revolution—A Bibliometric Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-13, June.
    9. Prabhu Mannadhan & Jerzy Ryszard Szymański & Marta Zurek-Mortka & Mithileysh Sathiyanarayanan, 2024. "A Novel Framework for the Iraqi Manufacturing Industry Towards the Adoption of Industry 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-19, October.
    10. Oscar F. Bustinza & Ferrán Vendrell-Herrero & Francisco J. Sánchez-Montesinos & José Antonio Campos-Granados, 2021. "Should Manufacturers Support the Entire Product Lifecycle with Services?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, February.
    11. Jorge Andrés-Sánchez & Jaume Gené-Albesa, 2024. "Not with the bot! The relevance of trust to explain the acceptance of chatbots by insurance customers," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    12. Tortorella, Guilherme Luz & Narayanamurthy, Gopalakrishnan & Thurer, Matthias, 2021. "Identifying pathways to a high-performing lean automation implementation: An empirical study in the manufacturing industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    13. Ghannouchi, Imen, 2023. "Examining the dynamic nexus between industry 4.0 technologies and sustainable economy: New insights from empirical evidence using GMM estimator across 20 OECD nations," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    14. Ismael Cristofer Baierle & Francisco Tardelli da Silva & Ricardo Gonçalves de Faria Correa & Jones Luís Schaefer & Matheus Becker Da Costa & Guilherme Brittes Benitez & Elpidio Oscar Benitez Nara, 2022. "Competitiveness of Food Industry in the Era of Digital Transformation towards Agriculture 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-22, September.
    15. Li, Ying & Dai, Jing & Cui, Li, 2020. "The impact of digital technologies on economic and environmental performance in the context of industry 4.0: A moderated mediation model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    16. Turkcan, Hulya & Imamoglu, Salih Zeki & Ince, Huseyin, 2022. "To be more innovative and more competitive in dynamic environments: The role of additive manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    17. Xi, Mengjie & Liu, Yang & Fang, Wei & Feng, Taiwen, 2024. "Intelligent manufacturing for strengthening operational resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic: A dynamic capability theory perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    18. Maria Kozlovska & Daria Klosova & Zuzana Strukova, 2021. "Impact of Industry 4.0 Platform on the Formation of Construction 4.0 Concept: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-15, March.
    19. Kumar, Mukesh & Tsolakis, Naoum & Agarwal, Anshul & Srai, Jagjit Singh, 2020. "Developing distributed manufacturing strategies from the perspective of a product-process matrix," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 1-17.
    20. Dong Liu & Yu Peng Zhu, 2023. "Evolution of Knowledge Structure in an Emerging Field Based on a Triple Helix Model: the Case of Smart Factory," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(4), pages 4583-4607, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3601-:d:1636065. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.