IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i7p3225-d1628333.html

Elevator Selection Methodology for Existing Residential Buildings Oriented Toward Living Quality Improvement

Author

Listed:
  • Dongxiao Chen

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Chunqing Li

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Rulong Gong

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Enlin Jin

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China)

Abstract

With the intensification of aging populations and economic development, installing elevators in existing residential buildings has become crucial for achieving SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities). While elevator retrofits improve accessibility, they may also compromise living quality through obstructed ventilation, reduced daylighting, visual interference, and noise pollution. Despite provincial guidelines in China specifying elevator types for retrofitting, the lack of clear selection criteria complicates implementation. This study addresses the challenge of scientifically selecting elevator types that balance accessibility improvements with minimal impact on residential environments. Focusing on 50 operational elevator retrofits in eight Beijing communities employing eight half-landing elevator models from the Beijing Multi-story Residential Elevator Retrofit Guidelines, we establish a comprehensive evaluation framework integrating objective measurements (indoor ventilation, noise, daylighting, and external visibility) and subjective resident assessments. Taking Xicheng District’s Yutaoyuan Community as a case study, this research identifies the optimal elevator configuration through a multi-criteria analysis. The proposed methodology offers two key contributions: (1) a practical elevator selection system providing technical and theoretical support for nationwide retrofitting projects, and (2) a quantifiable assessment tool aligning with the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda for urban renewal objectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Dongxiao Chen & Chunqing Li & Rulong Gong & Enlin Jin, 2025. "Elevator Selection Methodology for Existing Residential Buildings Oriented Toward Living Quality Improvement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-27, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3225-:d:1628333
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/3225/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/3225/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cao Gan & Mingyu Chen & Peter Rowe, 2020. "Beijing’s Selected Older Neighborhoods Measurement from the Perspective of Aging," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-29, May.
    2. P. Shim, Jung., 1989. "Bibliographical research on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 161-167.
    3. Fangyuan Zhang & Yuji Ryu, 2021. "Simulation Study on Indoor Air Distribution and Indoor Humidity Distribution of Three Ventilation Patterns Using Computational Fluid Dynamics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Xinjun Dai & Zeling Li & Lindong Ma & Jing Jin, 2022. "The Spatio-Temporal Pattern and Spatial Effect of Installation of Lifts in Old Residential Buildings: Evidence from Hangzhou in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, September.
    5. Yongqiang Chu & Shuguang Shen, 2022. "Adoption of Major Housing Adaptation Policy Innovation for Older Adults by Provincial Governments in China: The Case of Existing Multifamily Dwelling Elevator Retrofit Projects," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-14, May.
    6. Gavin R. McCormack & Autumn Nesdoly & Dalia Ghoneim & Tara-Leigh McHugh, 2020. "Realtors’ Perceptions of Social and Physical Neighborhood Characteristics Associated with Active Living: A Canadian Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Valentinas Podvezko, 2009. "Application of AHP technique," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 181-189, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pan, Zhuolin & Liu, Yuqi & Liu, Ye & Huo, Ziwen & Han, Wenchao, 2024. "Age-friendly neighbourhood environment, functional abilities and life satisfaction: A longitudinal analysis of older adults in urban China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    2. Zanakis, Stelios H. & Mandakovic, Tomislav & Gupta, Sushil K. & Sahay, Sundeep & Hong, Sungwan, 1995. "A review of program evaluation and fund allocation methods within the service and government sectors," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 59-79, March.
    3. Sadhan Malik & Subodh Chandra Pal & Biswajit Das & Rabin Chakrabortty, 2020. "Assessment of vegetation status of Sali River basin, a tributary of Damodar River in Bankura District, West Bengal, using satellite data," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 5651-5685, August.
    4. M Tavana & M A Sodenkamp, 2010. "A fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis model for advanced technology assessment at Kennedy Space Center," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(10), pages 1459-1470, October.
    5. Eva Trinkūnienė & Vaidotas Trinkūnas, 2014. "Knowledge Management in Composition of Construction Contracts," Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, Centre for Strategic and International Entrepreneurship at the Cracow University of Economics., vol. 2(4), pages 101-112.
    6. Zydrune Morkunaite & Romualdas Bausys & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, 2019. "Contractor Selection for Sgraffito Decoration of Cultural Heritage Buildings Using the WASPAS-SVNS Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-25, November.
    7. Baffoe, Gideon, 2019. "Exploring the utility of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in ranking livelihood activities for effective and sustainable rural development interventions in developing countries," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 197-204.
    8. Minkyu Song & Boyoung Kim, 2024. "An Analysis of Critical Factors Affecting the Success of Open Innovation Strategies in High-Tech Firms: The Case of South Korea," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-26, October.
    9. Shu Meng & Xin Gao & Lianfeng Duan, 2022. "Facing the COVID-19 Pandemic and Developing a Sustainable Entrepreneurial Ecosystem: The Theory and Practice of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Policies in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-20, July.
    10. Meiqi Zhou & Huasong Luo & Juhua Hong & Dashuai Gao & Yukun Shen & Maolin Liang, 2023. "Establishment of a value evaluation system for health and wellness tourism resources: Reflections on China’s official tourism resource evaluation criteria," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(7), pages 1-16, July.
    11. Hussain, Salman & Halpin, Lauran & McVittie, Alistair, 2008. "The economic viability of Environmental Management Systems: an application of Analytical Hierarchy Process as a methodological tool to rank trade-offs," Working Papers 61119, Scotland's Rural College (formerly Scottish Agricultural College), Land Economy & Environment Research Group.
    12. Chung, Shu-Hsing & Lee, Amy H. I. & Pearn, W. L., 2005. "Analytic network process (ANP) approach for product mix planning in semiconductor fabricator," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 15-36, April.
    13. Mukherjee, Krishnendu, 2014. "Analytic hierarchy process and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution: a bibliometric analysis from past, present and future of AHP and TOPSIS," MPRA Paper 59887, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Gargiulo, Carmela & Battarra, Rosaria & Tremiterra, Maria Rosa, 2020. "Coastal areas and climate change: A decision support tool for implementing adaptation measures," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    15. Hasan Zabihi & Mohsen Alizadeh & Philip Kibet Langat & Mohammadreza Karami & Himan Shahabi & Anuar Ahmad & Mohamad Nor Said & Saro Lee, 2019. "GIS Multi-Criteria Analysis by Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA): Toward an Integrated Citrus Management Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, February.
    16. Rafael Salas-Zárate & Giner Alor-Hernández & Mario Andrés Paredes-Valverde & María del Pilar Salas-Zárate & Maritza Bustos-López & José Luis Sánchez-Cervantes, 2024. "Mental-Health: An NLP-Based System for Detecting Depression Levels through User Comments on Twitter (X)," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-30, June.
    17. Mingkun Yu & Lei Zhao & Zuliang Chen & Jingyu Wu, 2025. "Balancing Solar Potential and Environmental Risk: A GIS-Based Site-Selection Approach for Concentrated Solar Power in Tibet," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-25, May.
    18. Fernando A. F. Ferreira & Sérgio P. Santos & Paulo M. M. Rodrigues & Ronald W. Spahr, 2014. "Evaluating retail banking service quality and convenience with MCDA techniques: a case study at the bank branch level," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, February.
    19. Chuc Anh Tu & Tapan Sarker & Ehsan Rasoulinezhad, 2020. "Factors Influencing the Green Bond Market Expansion: Evidence from a Multi-Dimensional Analysis," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-14, June.
    20. Chao-i Hsieh, 1997. "A Note on Corporate Overseas Investment Decision Priorities of Taiwanese Direct Real Estate Investors," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 13(3), pages 359-368.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3225-:d:1628333. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.