Author
Listed:
- Jolanta Kowalska
(Department of Organic Agriculture and Environmental Protection, Institute of Plant Protection—National Research Institute, Węgorka 20, 60-318 Poznan, Poland)
- Małgorzata Antkowiak
(Department of Organic Agriculture and Environmental Protection, Institute of Plant Protection—National Research Institute, Węgorka 20, 60-318 Poznan, Poland)
- Alicja Tymoszuk
(Laboratory of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Bernardynska 6, 85-029 Bydgoszcz, Poland)
- Kinga Matysiak
(Department of Weed Science and Plant Protection Technique, Institute of Plant Protection—National Research Institute, Węgorka 20, 60-318 Poznan, Poland)
- Paweł Sienkiewicz
(Department of Entomology and Environmental Protection, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Dabrowskiego 159, 60-594 Poznan, Poland)
Abstract
Flower strips (FSs) are an effective way to support the sustainable development of agricultural land. Properly managed FS on agricultural fields provide stable habitats for local arthropod populations, but over the years, it can be colonized by plants from the soil seed bank and then become a nuisance to surrounding crops. The aim of this study was to assess the botanical composition of FS in one year after establishment and to analyze the local population of Carabidae, most of which are predatory. Inventory of flowering plants in situ was made regularly from the beginning of June to the end of July, while beetles were collected in mid-July and August. It was found that plant species from the sown seed commercial mixture continued to dominate in the second year, but the proportion of species from the soil seed bank was also noted, ranging from 7.41% to 39.88%. It was concluded that Trifolium pratense L. and Chrysanthemum leucanthemum L. should be particularly recommended for strip sowing in the observed habitats. The species diversity (H’) of Carabidae was higher in the FS than in the cultivated fields. However, when comparing the Shannon–Wiener index for wheat and FS, regardless of time observation, no significant differences were noted. The most abundant ground beetle in the FS was Harpalus rupees , a universal predator that also feeds on weed seeds. Significantly fewer species and individuals of Carabidae were found in the alfalfa field than in the FS and wheat fields. The number of Carabidae was significantly higher in August than in July.
Suggested Citation
Jolanta Kowalska & Małgorzata Antkowiak & Alicja Tymoszuk & Kinga Matysiak & Paweł Sienkiewicz, 2025.
"Botanical Evaluation of the Two-Year-Old Flower Strip with Analysis of the Local Carabidae Population: Case Study,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-17, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3223-:d:1628256
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3223-:d:1628256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.