IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i5p2146-d1603588.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards a Circular Economy in Jordan: Selecting Organic Waste Treatment Options Using a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Hani Abu-Qdais

    (Civil Engineering Department, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 3030, Irbid 22110, Jordan)

  • Sarah Al-Omoush

    (Civil Engineering Department, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 3030, Irbid 22110, Jordan)

  • Haniyeh Jalalipour

    (Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Rostock, 18059 Rostock, Germany)

  • Abdallah Nassour

    (Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Rostock, 18059 Rostock, Germany)

Abstract

Solid waste management in Jordan is still following a linear model, where more than 90% of solid waste, including organic waste, is collected and disposed into landfills. Such practices are not sustainable and may lead to adverse public health and environmental impacts. Therefore, there is a pressing need to look for alternative organic waste management by adopting circular economy principles through which the adverse impacts are minimized and the benefits from the resources are maximized. The main objective of this study is to select the appropriate treatment technology for organic solid waste management in Jordan. To achieve this objective, an analytical hierarchy process was used as a decision making tool. A hierarchy model that consists of four levels was employed with 3 main criteria and 10 sub-criteria to assess 4 alternatives of organic waste treatment. Based on the experts’ opinions and the pairwise comparison, the AHP model results showed that the environmental and public health criterion is the most important. On the other hand, the most sustainable treatment option of the organic waste treatment is composting with a weight of 0.373, followed by landfilling with a weight of 0.203. Anaerobic digestion ranked third as an alternative, with a weight of 0.201, while the least-preferred treatment technology was found to be the mechanical biological treatment, with a weight of 0.193. Sensitivity analysis based on varying the main criteria weights under different scenarios showed the robustness of the AHP model, where composting continued to be the first ranked under most of the considered scenarios. Since the national solid waste management strategy is currently subject to review, the findings of the current study provide a valuable information for the decision makers in Jordan to update their strategic plans and move towards a circular economy option.

Suggested Citation

  • Hani Abu-Qdais & Sarah Al-Omoush & Haniyeh Jalalipour & Abdallah Nassour, 2025. "Towards a Circular Economy in Jordan: Selecting Organic Waste Treatment Options Using a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2146-:d:1603588
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2146/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2146/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mahdi Ikhlayel & Yoshiro Higano & Helmut Yabar & Takeshi Mizunoya, 2016. "Introducing an Integrated Municipal Solid Waste Management System: Assessment in Jordan," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(2), pages 1-43, January.
    2. Hani A. Abu-Qdais & Anna I. Kurbatova, 2022. "The Role of Eco-Industrial Parks in Promoting Circular Economy in Russia: A Life Cycle Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Wasi Ul Hassan Shah & Rizwana Yasmeen & Muddassar Sarfraz & Larisa Ivascu, 2023. "The Repercussions of Economic Growth, Industrialization, Foreign Direct Investment, and Technology on Municipal Solid Waste: Evidence from OECD Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, January.
    4. Ra’ed Nahar Myyas & Marcos Tostado-Véliz & Manuel Gómez-González & Francisco Jurado, 2023. "Review of Bioenergy Potential in Jordan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-22, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kovács, Olivér, 2025. "A minőségi növekedés felé - a nemnövekedés értékelése [The road to qualitative growth: Revisiting the concept of degrowth]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 59-91.
    2. Barra, Cristian & Falcone, Pasquale Marcello, 2024. "Environmental performance of countries. Examining the effect of diverse institutional factors in a metafrontier approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    3. Muhammad Zaheer Akhtar & Khalid Zaman & Muhammad Azhar Khan, 2024. "Governance, foreign investment, and growth: the impact of governance indicators, foreign direct investment, economic expansion, and industrialization on carbon emissions," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(12), pages 1-25, December.
    4. Muhammad Amir & Rola Pola Anto, 2018. "A Study Policy Implementation of Waste Management in Konawe Regency-Indonesia," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(1), pages 1-90, January.
    5. Marius Pislaru & Ciprian Sorin Vlad & Larisa Ivascu & Iulia Ioana Mircea, 2024. "Citizen-Centric Governance: Enhancing Citizen Engagement through Artificial Intelligence Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-17, March.
    6. Kairui Cao & Laiqun Jin & Yuanyuan Zhu & Zilong Nie & Hao Li, 2022. "Does China’s National Demonstration Eco-Industrial Park Reduce Carbon Dioxide and Sulfur Dioxide—A Study Based on the Upgrading and Transformation Process," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-19, October.
    7. Konstantinos Tsimnadis & Grigorios L. Kyriakopoulos & Garyfallos Arabatzis & Stefanos Leontopoulos & Efthimios Zervas, 2023. "An Innovative and Alternative Waste Collection Recycling Program Based on Source Separation of Municipal Solid Wastes (MSW) and Operating with Mobile Green Points (MGPs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.
    8. Nadezhda Blagoeva & Vanya Georgieva & Delyana Dimova, 2023. "Relationship between GDP and Municipal Waste: Regional Disparities and Implication for Waste Management Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-23, October.
    9. Chishti, Muhammad Zubair & Arfaoui, Nadia & Cheong, Calvin W.H., 2023. "Exploring the time-varying asymmetric effects of environmental regulation policies and human capital on sustainable development efficiency: A province level evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    10. George E. Halkos & Panagiotis-Stavros C. Aslanidis, 2024. "How Waste Crisis Altered the Common Understanding: From Fordism to Circular Economy and Sustainable Development," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 1513-1537, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2146-:d:1603588. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.