IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i2p549-d1565464.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk in Sustainability Reporting: Designing a DEMATEL-Based Model for Enhanced Transparency and Accountability

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmadreza Kazemi

    (Department of Accounting and Finance, University of Tehran, Aras International Campus, Tehran 1417763133, Iran)

  • Sasan Mehrani

    (Department of Accounting and Auditing, Faculty of Accounting and Finance, College of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran 1411713114, Iran)

  • Saeid Homayoun

    (Department of Business and Economic Studies, University of Gävle, 80176 Gävle, Sweden)

Abstract

The primary concern of research in the area of fraud risk relevant to sustainability reporting lies in understanding the potential for fraudulent or misleading reporting practices and developing strategies and tools to identify and prevent such behaviors. Taking into consideration that significant research has yet to be conducted on fraud risk models associated with sustainability reporting, this study represents an innovative contribution. It uses a mixed-methods approach to design a fraud risk model based on sustainability reporting. Given its type and approach, this research does not posit any hypotheses involving thematic analysis and the Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) method. This study is exploratory and applied, aiming to design a model through a mixed-methods methodology. Therefore, the research is hypothesis-free and instead utilizes a qualitative sample of experts and academics in the field of accounting from Iran and Denmark. The DEMATEL technique identifies key external and internal factors that significantly impact sustainability reporting, including comprehensive internal controls, strong governance and oversight, training and awareness, the utilization of technology, and data analytics. The influence of stakeholders, third-party audits, and the credibility of sustainability reports emerges as particularly significant in this context, exceeding the impact of other factors. These findings underscore that stakeholders, third-party audits, and report credibility to play a more prominent role in shaping sustainability performance compared to other considerations. This would imply that such variables remain key drivers in the perceptiveness and effectiveness of sustainability performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmadreza Kazemi & Sasan Mehrani & Saeid Homayoun, 2025. "Risk in Sustainability Reporting: Designing a DEMATEL-Based Model for Enhanced Transparency and Accountability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-19, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:549-:d:1565464
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/2/549/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/2/549/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Colin Higgins & Wendy Stubbs & Markus Milne, 2018. "Is Sustainability Reporting Becoming Institutionalised? The Role of an Issues-Based Field," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 147(2), pages 309-326, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rasim Serdar Kurdoglu, 2020. "The Mirage of Procedural Justice and the Primacy of Interactional Justice in Organizations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(3), pages 495-512, December.
    2. Othmar Manfred Lehner & Alex Nicholls & Sarah Beatrice Kapplmüller, 2022. "Arenas of Contestation: A Senian Social Justice Perspective on the Nature of Materiality in Impact Measurement," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(4), pages 971-989, September.
    3. Ana Zrnic & Dubravka Pekanov & Ivana Fosi?, 0000. "GRI-based Sustainability Reporting in the European Union Energy Sector: A Comprehensive Overview," Proceedings of Economics and Finance Conferences 14115959, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    4. Olivier Boiral & Iñaki Heras-Saizarbitoria & Marie-Christine Brotherton & Julie Bernard, 2019. "Ethical Issues in the Assurance of Sustainability Reports: Perspectives from Assurance Providers," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(4), pages 1111-1125, November.
    5. Stephen N. Hamilton & Richard D. Waters, 2022. "Mainstreaming Standardized Sustainability Reporting: Comparing Fortune 50 Corporations’ and U.S. News & World Report’s Top 50 Global Universities’ Sustainability Reports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-17, March.
    6. Sarah Birrell Ivory & R. Bradley MacKay, 2020. "Scaling sustainability from the organizational periphery to the strategic core: Towards a practice‐based framework of what practitioners “do”," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 2058-2077, July.
    7. Frank Hubers & Thomas Thijssens, 2023. "Protect, respect, remedy, and report? Development of human rights reporting in the context of formal institutional settings," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(6), pages 2783-2798, November.
    8. Melea Press, 2021. "Developing a strong sustainability research program in marketing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(1), pages 96-114, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:549-:d:1565464. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.