IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i21p9457-d1778849.html

Deep Learning for Sustainable Product Design: Shuffle-GhostNet Optimized by Enhanced Hippopotamus Optimizer to Life Cycle Assessment Integration

Author

Listed:
  • Anastasiia Rozhok

    (English Language Department of Engineering, Technical University of Sofia, 8 Kliment Ohridski Blvd., 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria)

  • Tasho Tashev

    (Department of Computer Systems, Faculty of Computer Systems and Technologies, Technical University of Sofia, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria)

  • Asparuh Markovski

    (Department of Systems and Control, Faculty of Automatics, Technical University of Sofia, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria)

  • Mihail Tuchin

    (Department of Power Engineering, Bauman Moscow State Technical University, 105005 Moscow, Russia)

  • Liubov Karnaukhova

    (Department of Power Engineering, Bauman Moscow State Technical University, 105005 Moscow, Russia)

  • Mikhail Ivanov

    (Department of Ecology and Industrial Safety, Bauman Moscow State Technical University, 105005 Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

The intelligence of sustainable design is reflected in the demands for accurate and real-time environmental impact assessments; traditional LCA methods are slow and static. In this paper, we propose a novel deep learning framework that serially links Shuffle-GhostNet (a lightweight convolutional neural network employing a combination of Ghost and Shuffle modules) improved by an enhanced version of Hippopotamus Optimizer (EHHO) for hyperparameter tuning and enhanced convergence. Upon testing the model on the Ecoinvent and OpenLCA Nexus datasets, pronounced advantages in predicting CO 2 emissions, energy use, and other sustainability indicators were found. Coupling the integration of multi-source sensor data and optimizing the architecture via metaheuristic search enables rapid and reliable decision support on eco-design. Final results are significantly better than the baseline models, achieving an R 2 of up to 0.943 with actual performance gains. AI-driven modeling integrated with LCA constitutes a pathway toward dynamic and scalable sustainability assessment in Industry 4.0 and circular economy applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Anastasiia Rozhok & Tasho Tashev & Asparuh Markovski & Mihail Tuchin & Liubov Karnaukhova & Mikhail Ivanov, 2025. "Deep Learning for Sustainable Product Design: Shuffle-GhostNet Optimized by Enhanced Hippopotamus Optimizer to Life Cycle Assessment Integration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-35, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9457-:d:1778849
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9457/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9457/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huan Lin & Xiaolei Deng & Jianping Yu & Xiaoliang Jiang & Dongsong Zhang, 2023. "A Study of Sustainable Product Design Evaluation Based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Deep Residual Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Slavkovic, Katarina & Stephan, André, 2025. "Dynamic life cycle assessment of buildings and building stocks – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yutong Zhang & Jiantao Wu & Li Sun & Guoan Yang, 2025. "Contrastive Learning-Based Cross-Modal Fusion for Product Form Imagery Recognition: A Case Study on New Energy Vehicle Front-End Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-28, May.
    2. Komninos Angelakoglou & Ioannis Lampropoulos & Eleni Chatzigeorgiou & Paraskevi Giourka & Georgios Martinopoulos & Angelos-Saverios Skembris & Andreas Seitaridis & Georgia Kousovista & Nikos Nikolopou, 2025. "Advancing Energy-Efficient Renovation Through Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment and Costing: Insights and Experiences from VERIFY Tool Deployment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-25, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9457-:d:1778849. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.