IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i20p9349-d1776348.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing the Sustainability of Asphalt Mixtures: A Focus on Operational Factors and Dataset for Environmental Product Declarations

Author

Listed:
  • Rita Kleizienė

    (Road Research Institute, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio Av. 11, 10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Gabriella Buttitta

    (Department of Engineering, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze Ed.8, 90128 Palermo, Italy
    National Sustainable Mobility Center (Centro Nazionale per la Mobilità Sostenibile-CNMS), 20158 Milano, Italy)

  • Nicolás Carreño

    (VINCI Construction Shared Services GmbH, Forschung & Technik, Rheinbabenstraße 75, 46240 Bottrop, Germany)

  • Davide Lo Presti

    (Department of Engineering, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze Ed.8, 90128 Palermo, Italy
    National Sustainable Mobility Center (Centro Nazionale per la Mobilità Sostenibile-CNMS), 20158 Milano, Italy)

Abstract

The demand for reliable Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) of asphalt mixtures is growing, particularly as they are increasingly used in public road construction tenders across Europe. However, the reliability and comparability of EPDs remain limited due to two main challenges: (i) significant variability in dataset selection for key materials such as bitumen and aggregates, and (ii) uncertainty regarding the influence of operational factors, including aggregate moisture, mixing temperature, and transportation. The objective of this research is to assess the influence of dataset selection and operational parameters on the environmental performance of an asphalt mixture, focusing on improving the reliability of EPDs. Within this research, a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was conducted using a cradle-to-gate approach (A1–A3), including modules C1–C4 and D, in compliance with EN 15804:2019+A2:2020. Primary data were collected from an asphalt plant in Lithuania, while secondary data were obtained from the Ecoinvent database. The sensitivity analyses were performed to investigate the variation of data set choices and key operational factors that influence the environmental impact. The assessment was carried out using the Simapro 9.6 software and the EF 3.1 impact assessment method. The results indicate significant sensitivity to dataset selection, particularly for bitumen and dolomite production, leading to environmental impact variations of up to 41.8% and 35.3%, respectively. Among operational factors, reducing aggregate moisture from 5% to 3% by sheltering stockpiles helps achieve the highest environmental impact reduction (3.2% under the Aggregate Single Score), while lowering mixing temperatures to 130 °C resulted in a 1.6% decrease. Transportation mode selection contributed to emission variations between 1.8% and 6.7%, with long-distance aggregate transport increasing emissions by up to 14.6%. The research findings underscore the critical need for harmonizing dataset selection and optimizing operational processes to improve asphalt sustainability. Standardizing datasets is essential for ensuring fair and transparent EPD generation for asphalt mixtures, particularly when used in road construction tenders, as seen in several European countries. Future research should explore the integration of reclaimed asphalt (RA) and assess its potential environmental benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Rita Kleizienė & Gabriella Buttitta & Nicolás Carreño & Davide Lo Presti, 2025. "Enhancing the Sustainability of Asphalt Mixtures: A Focus on Operational Factors and Dataset for Environmental Product Declarations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-22, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9349-:d:1776348
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9349/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9349/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giani, Martina Irene & Dotelli, Giovanni & Brandini, Nicolò & Zampori, Luca, 2015. "Comparative life cycle assessment of asphalt pavements using reclaimed asphalt, warm mix technology and cold in-place recycling," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 104(PA), pages 224-238.
    2. Mayara S. Siverio Lima & Mohsen Hajibabaei & Sina Hesarkazzazi & Robert Sitzenfrei & Alexander Buttgereit & Cesar Queiroz & Viktors Haritonovs & Florian Gschösser, 2021. "Determining the Environmental Potentials of Urban Pavements by Applying the Cradle-to-Cradle LCA Approach for a Road Network of a Midscale German City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-14, November.
    3. Mayara S. Siverio Lima & Mohsen Hajibabaei & Sina Hesarkazzazi & Robert Sitzenfrei & Alexander Buttgereit & Cesar Queiroz & Arnold Tautschnig & Florian Gschösser, 2020. "Environmental Potentials of Asphalt Materials Applied to Urban Roads: Case Study of the City of Münster," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Anna Kadefors & Sofia Lingegård & Stefan Uppenberg & Johanna Alkan-Olsson & Daniel Balian, 2021. "Designing and implementing procurement requirements for carbon reduction in infrastructure construction – international overview and experiences," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 64(4), pages 611-634, March.
    5. Gabriella Buttitta & Gaspare Giancontieri & Tony Parry & Davide Lo Presti, 2023. "Modelling the Environmental and Economic Life Cycle Performance of Maximizing Asphalt Recycling on Road Pavement Surfaces in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-30, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mayara Sarisariyama Siverio Lima & Christina Makoundou & Cesare Sangiorgi & Florian Gschösser, 2022. "Life Cycle Assessment of Innovative Asphalt Mixtures Made with Crumb Rubber for Impact-Absorbing Pavements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-12, November.
    2. Jose Luis Osorio-Tejada & Eva Llera-Sastresa & Sabina Scarpellini, 2024. "Environmental assessment of road freight transport services beyond the tank-to-wheels analysis based on LCA," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 421-451, January.
    3. Taísa Medina & João Luiz Calmon & Darli Vieira & Alencar Bravo & Thalya Vieira, 2023. "Life Cycle Assessment of Road Pavements That Incorporate Waste Reuse: A Systematic Review and Guidelines Proposal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-21, October.
    4. Wesam Salah Alaloul & Muhammad Altaf & Muhammad Ali Musarat & Muhammad Faisal Javed & Amir Mosavi, 2021. "Systematic Review of Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Cost Analysis for Pavement and a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-38, April.
    5. Zheng, Suyi & Wen, Jiandong, 2024. "Green public procurement and corporate environmental performance: An empirical analysis based on data from green procurement contracts," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    6. Qiang Du & Hongyu Zhu & Youdan Huang & Qiaoyu Pang & Jinzhao Shi, 2024. "Profit allocation of carbon emission reduction in the construction supply chain," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 20531-20560, August.
    7. Wang, Yanpeng & Cui, Lianbiao & Zhou, Jie, 2025. "The impact of green finance and digital economy on regional carbon emission reduction," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    8. Hasan A. M. Hamdan & Luitzen de Boer & Daniela Baer, 2021. "When Green Procurement Meets Complexity: The Case of Sustainable Neighborhood Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    9. Pablo Ortega Carrasco & Fabio Iannone & Vera Ferrón Vílchez & Francesco Testa, 2025. "Green public procurement as an effective way for sustainable development: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(2), pages 2364-2391, April.
    10. Bryce, James & Brodie, Stefanie & Parry, Tony & Lo Presti, Davide, 2017. "A systematic assessment of road pavement sustainability through a review of rating tools," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 108-118.
    11. Mayara S. Siverio Lima & Mohsen Hajibabaei & Sina Hesarkazzazi & Robert Sitzenfrei & Alexander Buttgereit & Cesar Queiroz & Viktors Haritonovs & Florian Gschösser, 2021. "Determining the Environmental Potentials of Urban Pavements by Applying the Cradle-to-Cradle LCA Approach for a Road Network of a Midscale German City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-14, November.
    12. Sofia Lingegård & Johanna Alkan Olsson & Anna Kadefors & Stefan Uppenberg, 2021. "Sustainable Public Procurement in Large Infrastructure Projects—Policy Implementation for Carbon Emission Reductions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-21, October.
    13. Raymond Stokke & Xinlu Qiu & Magnus Sparrevik & Shannon Truloff & Iselin Borge & Luitzen Boer, 2023. "Procurement for zero-emission construction sites: a comparative study of four European cities," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 72-86, March.
    14. Chiappinelli, Olga & Seres, Gyula, 2024. "Optimal discounts in green public procurement," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    15. Martin Decky & Katarina Hodasova & Zuzana Papanova & Eva Remisova, 2022. "Sustainable Adaptive Cycle Pavements Using Composite Foam Concrete at High Altitudes in Central Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    16. Lukas Hausberger & Tobias Cordes & Florian Gschösser, 2023. "Life Cycle Assessment of High-Performance Railway Infrastructure, Analysis of Superstructures in Tunnels and on Open Tracks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, April.
    17. Sofia Lingegård & Malena I. Havenvid & Per-Erik Eriksson, 2021. "Circular Public Procurement through Integrated Contracts in the Infrastructure Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
    18. Fusong Wang & Xiaoqing Li & Chao Huang & Wangwang Zhou & Dongxing Luan, 2024. "Integrative Benefits of Carbon Emission and Economic Cost for Self-Healing, Ultra-Thin Overlay Contained Steel Fiber," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-14, October.
    19. Jiawei Wu & Xunrong Ye & Huachun Cui, 2025. "Recycled Materials in Construction: Trends, Status, and Future of Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-38, March.
    20. Chiappinelli, Olga & Dalò, Ambrogio & Giuffrida, Leonardo M., 2024. "The greener, the better? Evidence from government contractors," ZEW Discussion Papers 24-060, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9349-:d:1776348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.