IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i20p9269-d1774710.html

Socio-Environmental Assessment of a Tailings Water Softening Technology for Reuse in Alternative Systems in Central Chile: An Approach to Industrial Ecology

Author

Listed:
  • Marco A. Vargas

    (Departamento de Ingeniería Química y Procesos de Minerales, Universidad de Antofagasta, Av. Angamos 601, Antofagasta 1240000, Chile
    Centre for Management Studies (CEG-IST), Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisbon, 1649-004 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Luis A. Cisternas

    (Departamento de Ingeniería Química y Procesos de Minerales, Universidad de Antofagasta, Av. Angamos 601, Antofagasta 1240000, Chile
    Advanced Mining Technology Center, Universidad de Chile, Tupper 2007, Santiago 8370451, Chile)

  • Yasna Tapia

    (Advanced Mining Technology Center, Universidad de Chile, Tupper 2007, Santiago 8370451, Chile
    Departamento de Ingeniería y Suelos, Facultad de Ciencias Agronómicas, Universidad de Chile, Santiago 11315, Santiago 8820808, Chile)

  • Ana Carvalho

    (Centre for Management Studies (CEG-IST), Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisbon, 1649-004 Lisbon, Portugal)

Abstract

In north-central Chile, water reuse is essential due to the arid climate. Mining tailings ponds offer a promising opportunity for water recovery; however, the water quality often fails to meet the environmental standards for discharging liquid waste into marine and inland surface waters. This study proposes a bioreactor-based technology for softening tailings water while also addressing the need to quantify its sustainability impacts. To achieve that, an evaluation of the environmental and social performance of the bioreactor is conducted, comparing it with established softening methods, using an industrial ecology approach. This evaluation aims to explore scalable alternatives for sustainable water management. Environmental impacts are quantified using the ReCiPe 2016, with data sourced from Ecoinvent v3.8 and Agrifootprint databases. Social risks are assessed through the Social Hotspot Database modeling in SimaPro 9.5.0.2. The results indicate that the bioreactor demonstrates greater sustainability compared to membrane-based systems, reducing greenhouse gas emissions by more than 95%. It also registers the lowest aggregated social risks due to its minimal energy intensity, lack of hazardous chemicals, and simplified infrastructure. In contrast, reverse osmosis, while delivering higher quality permeate, results in the highest environmental burdens and occupational hazards. This research validates the bioreactor as an enabler of industrial ecology, transforming tailings water into a circular resource.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco A. Vargas & Luis A. Cisternas & Yasna Tapia & Ana Carvalho, 2025. "Socio-Environmental Assessment of a Tailings Water Softening Technology for Reuse in Alternative Systems in Central Chile: An Approach to Industrial Ecology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9269-:d:1774710
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9269/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9269/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joel Joaquim de Santana Filho & Pedro Dinis Gaspar & Arminda do Paço & Sara M. Marcelino, 2025. "Governance-Centred Industrial Symbiosis for Circular Economy Transitions: A Rural Forest Biomass Hub Framework Proposal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-30, June.
    2. Anni Orola & Anna Härri & Jarkko Levänen & Ville Uusitalo & Stig Irving Olsen, 2022. "Assessing WELBY Social Life Cycle Assessment Approach through Cobalt Mining Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-26, September.
    3. Zanini, Marco Tulio Fundão & Migueles, Carmen Pires & Gambirage, Cinara & Silva, Jaison, 2023. "Barriers to local community participation in mining projects: The eroding role of power imbalance and information asymmetry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PB).
    4. Claudia Alanis & Liliana Ávila-Córdoba & Ariana Cruz-Olayo & Reyna Natividad & Alejandro Padilla-Rivera, 2025. "Integrating Environmental and Social Life Cycle Assessment for Sustainable University Mobility Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-24, August.
    5. Georgios Archimidis Tsalidis & Gijsbert Korevaar, 2019. "Social Life Cycle Assessment of Brine Treatment in the Process Industry: A Consequential Approach Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-17, October.
    6. Evelyn Lobsiger-Kägi & Luis López & Tobias Kuehn & Raoul Roth & Vicente Carabias & Christian Zipper, 2018. "Social Life Cycle Assessment: Specific Approach and Case Study for Switzerland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-24, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Somayeh Rezaei Kalvani & Amir Hamzah Sharaai & Ibrahim Kabir Abdullahi, 2021. "Social Consideration in Product Life Cycle for Product Social Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Radtke, Jörg, 2025. "E-participation in energy transitions: What does it mean? Chances and challenges within Germany's Energiewende," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    3. Louisa Pollok & Sebastian Spierling & Hans-Josef Endres & Ulrike Grote, 2021. "Social Life Cycle Assessments: A Review on Past Development, Advances and Methodological Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-29, September.
    4. Marcus Jerome Byrne & Michele John & Wahidul Biswas, 2025. "Future Risk from Current Sustainability Assessment Frameworks for the Resource Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-25, January.
    5. Kingsley Igenepo John & Aderemi Timothy Adeleye & Sehrish Munsif & Babatope Oluseun Odusina & Martins O. Omorogie, 2026. "Perspectives On Circular Economy and Efficient Resource Utilization of Valorized Value-Added Material for Sustainable Development," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-37, February.
    6. Georgios Archimidis Tsalidis, 2020. "Integrating Individual Behavior Dimension in Social Life Cycle Assessment in an Energy Transition Context," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Yılmaz Kaplan & Vedat Kaya, 2026. "The Circular Transformation of Industrial Parks In-between Competition and Cooperation: An Institutionalist Analysis," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 1-23, April.
    8. Junmei Luo & Yang Shen & Zhonghui Jiang, 2026. "Digital Transparency Alienation: When Information Transparency Undermines Affordance-Driven Innovation Under Environmental Uncertainty," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 17(2), pages 3852-3874, April.
    9. Tsalidis, Georgios Archimidis & de Santo, Elena & Gallart, Jose Jorge Espí & Corberá, Joan Berzosa & Blanco, Frederic Clarens & Pesch, Udo & Korevaar, Gijsbert, 2021. "Developing social life cycle assessment based on corporate social responsibility: A chemical process industry case regarding human rights," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    10. Khalid Mujahid Alharbi & Amina Elshamly & Ibrahim G. Mahgoub, 2025. "Do Regulatory Pressures and Stakeholder Expectations Drive CSR Adherence in the Chemical Industry?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-22, March.
    11. Ilyas Masudin & Muhammad Iqbal Syahrial & Dian Palupi Restuputri & S. Sarifah Radiah Shariff, 2026. "From Cradle to Caution: Assessing Social Sustainability Risks in Veneer Manufacturing Via Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA) and Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 1-28, April.
    12. Ana Marija Alfirević & Maja Mihaljević Kosor & Nikša Alfirević, 2025. "Institutional and Entrepreneurial Drivers of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises’ Circular Economy Practices in Central and Eastern Europe and the Western Balkans," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-12, August.
    13. Leonel J. R. Nunes, 2025. "Gasification Processes of Portuguese Biomass: Theoretical Analysis of Hydrogen Production Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-32, August.
    14. Kainiemi, Laura & Laukkanen, Minttu & Levänen, Jarkko, 2025. "Multi-sectoral interactions in energy transition: Unveiling tensions between sustainability and justice," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 384(C).
    15. Francisco Javier Flor-Montalvo & Jorge Luis García-Alcaraz & Agustín Sánchez-Toledo Ledesma & Leandro Álvarez-Kurogi, 2020. "Social-LCA. Methodological Proposal Applied to Physical Activity Program Implementation into Old People’s Routines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-19, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9269-:d:1774710. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.